The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis and Grading of Papilledema in Patients With Raised Intracranial Pressure Using Optical Coherence Tomography vs Clinical Expert Assessment Using a Clinical Staging Scale
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast 2 methods of quantitating papilledema, namely, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Modified Frisén Scale (MFS). METHODS: Digital optic disc photographs and OCT fast retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, fast RNFL map, total retinal thickness, and fast disc images were obtained in 36 patients with papilledema. Digital optic disc photographs were randomized and graded by 4 masked expert reviewers using the MFS. We performed Spearman rank correlations of OCT RNFL thickness, OCT total retinal thickness, and MFS grade from photographs. RESULTS: OCT RNFL thickness and MFS grade from photographs correlated well (R = 0.85). OCT total retinal thickness and MFS grade from photographs had a similar correlation of 0.87. Comparing OCT RNFL thickness with OCT total retinal thickness, a slope of 1.64 suggests a greater degree of papilledema thickness change when using the latter. CONCLUSIONS: For lower-grade abnormalities, OCT compares favorably with clinical staging of optic nerve photographs. With higher grades, OCT RNFL thickness processing algorithms often fail, with OCT total retinal thickness performing more favorably.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Huang, D., Swanson, E. A., Lin, C. P., Schuman, J. S., Stinson, W. G., Chang, W., Hee, M. R., Flotte, T., Gregory, K., Puliafito, C. A., et al. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1957169 · Cited by 13,788
Imaging of Macular Diseases with Optical Coherence Tomography
Puliafito, C. A., Hee, M. R., Lin, C. P., Reichel, E., Schuman, J. S., Duker, J. S., Izatt, J. A., Swanson, E. A., & Fujimoto, J. G. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31032-9 · Cited by 1,267
Schuman, J. S. (1995) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100050054031 · Cited by 879
Quantitative Assessment of Macular Edema With Optical Coherence Tomography
Hee, M. R. (1995) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100080071031 · Cited by 710
Reproducibility of Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Schuman, J. S., Pedut-Kloizman, T., Hertzmark, E., Hee, M. R., Wilkins, J. R., Coker, J. G., Puliafito, C. A., Fujimoto, J. G., & Swanson, E. A. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30410-7 · Cited by 665
Bouma, B. E., de Boer, J. F., Huang, D., Jang, I., Yonetsu, T., Leggett, C. L., Leitgeb, R. A., Sampson, D. D., Suter, M. J., Vakoc, B. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00162-2 · Cited by 649
Topography of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography
Hee, M. R., Puliafito, C. A., Duker, J. S., Reichel, E., Coker, J. G., Wilkins, J. R., Schuman, J. S., Swanson, E. A., & Fujimoto, J. G. (1998) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(98)93601-6 · Cited by 633
Paunescu, L. A., Schuman, J. S., Price, L. L., Stark, P. C., Beaton, S., Ishikawa, H., Wollstein, G., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2004) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0514 · Cited by 536
Optical Coherence Tomography of Macular Holes
Hee, M. R., Puliafito, C. A., Wong, C., Duker, J. S., Reichel, E., Schuman, J. S., Swanson, E. A., & Fujimoto, J. G. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30959-1 · Cited by 503
Swelling of the optic nerve head: a staging scheme
Frisen, L. (1982) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.45.1.13 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
Wall, M. (2010) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2010.03.003 · Cited by 656
The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial: Clinical Profile at Baseline
Wall, M., Kupersmith, M. J., Kieburtz, K. D., Corbett, J. J., Feldon, S. E., Friedman, D. I., Katz, D. M., Keltner, J. L., Schron, E. B., & McDermott, M. P. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.133 · Cited by 481
Patel, N., Pass, A., Mason, S., Gibson, C. R., & Otto, C. (2018) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6226 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, C. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 705
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973369190
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and Grading of Papilledema in Patients With Raised Intracranial Pressure Using Optical Coherence Tomography vs Clinical Expert Assessment Using a Clinical Staging Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.94
- The paper
- Scott, C. J. (2010). Diagnosis and Grading of Papilledema in Patients With Raised Intracranial Pressure Using Optical Coherence Tomography vs Clinical Expert Assessment Using a Clinical Staging Scale. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.94
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
