Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial: Clinical Profile at Baseline

Open access
Wall, Michael, Kupersmith, Mark J., Kieburtz, Karl D., Corbett, James J., Feldon, Steven E., Friedman, Deborah I., Katz, David M., Keltner, John L., Schron, Eleanor B., McDermott, Michael P.·2014·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, there are no large prospective cohorts of untreated patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) to characterize the disease. OBJECTIVE: To report the baseline clinical and laboratory features of patients enrolled in the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We collected data at baseline from questionnaires, examinations, automated perimetry, and fundus photography grading. Patients (n = 165) were enrolled from March 17, 2010, to November 27, 2012, at 38 academic and private practice sites in North America. All participants met the modified Dandy criteria for IIH and had a perimetric mean deviation between -2 dB and -7 dB. All but 4 participants were women. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Baseline and laboratory characteristics. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of our patients was 29.0 (7.4) years and 4 (2.4%) were men. The average (SD) body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 39.9 (8.3). Headache was the most common symptom (84%). Transient visual obscurations occurred in 68% of patients, back pain in 53%, and pulse synchronous tinnitus in 52%. Only 32% reported visual loss. The average (SD) perimetric mean deviation in the worst eye was -3.5 (1.1) dB, (range, -2.0 to -6.4 dB) and in the best eye was -2.3 (1.1) dB (range, -5.2 to 0.8 dB). A partial arcuate visual field defect with an enlarged blind spot was the most common perimetric finding. Visual acuity was 85 letters or better (20/20) in 71% of the worst eyes and 77% of the best eyes. Quality of life measures, including the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 and the Short Form-36 physical and mental health summary scales, were lower compared with population norms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial represents the largest prospectively analyzed cohort of untreated patients with IIH. Our data show that IIH is almost exclusively a disease of obese young women. Patients with IIH with mild visual loss have typical symptoms, may have mild acuity loss, and have visual field defects, with predominantly arcuate loss and enlarged blind spots that require formal perimetry for detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01003639.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.133

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Wall, M., Kupersmith, M. J., Kieburtz, K. D., Corbett, J. J., Feldon, S. E., Friedman, D. I., Katz, D. M., Keltner, J. L., Schron, E. B., & McDermott, M. P.
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2014-06-01
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
693
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011664591
Cited by
481
References
24
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial: Clinical Profile at Baseline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.133
The paper
Wall, M., Kupersmith, M. J., Kieburtz, K. D., Corbett, J. J., Feldon, S. E., Friedman, D. I., Katz, D. M., Keltner, J. L., Schron, E. B., & McDermott, M. P. (2014). The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial: Clinical Profile at Baseline. JAMA Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.