The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in Treated Glaucoma
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine intraocular pressure (IOP)-dependent and IOP-independent variables associated with visual field (VF) progression in treated glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of the Glaucoma Progression Study. METHODS: Consecutive, treated glaucoma patients with repeatable VF loss who had 8 or more VF examinations of either eye, using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (24-2 SITA-Standard, Humphrey Field Analyzer II; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, California), during the period between January 1999 and September 2009 were included. Visual field progression was evaluated using automated pointwise linear regression. Evaluated data included age, sex, race, central corneal thickness, baseline VF mean deviation, mean follow-up IOP, peak IOP, IOP fluctuation, a detected disc hemorrhage, and presence of beta-zone parapapillary atrophy. RESULTS: We selected 587 eyes of 587 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [13.0] years). The mean (SD) number of VFs was 11.1 (3.0), spanning a mean (SD) of 6.4 (1.7) years. In the univariable model, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.19 per decade; P = .01), baseline diagnosis of exfoliation syndrome (OR, 1.79; P = .01), decreased central corneal thickness (OR, 1.38 per 40 μm thinner; P < .01), a detected disc hemorrhage (OR, 2.31; P < .01), presence of beta-zone parapapillary atrophy (OR, 2.17; P < .01), and all IOP parameters (mean follow-up, peak, and fluctuation; P < .01) were associated with increased risk of VF progression. In the multivariable model, peak IOP (OR, 1.13; P < .01), thinner central corneal thickness (OR, 1.45 per 40 μm thinner; P < .01), a detected disc hemorrhage (OR, 2.59; P < .01), and presence of beta-zone parapapillary atrophy (OR, 2.38; P < .01) were associated with VF progression. CONCLUSIONS: IOP-dependent and IOP-independent risk factors affect disease progression in treated glaucoma. Peak IOP is a better predictor of progression than is IOP mean or fluctuation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capps, L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2487-b · Cited by 4,526
(2000) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00538-9 · Cited by 2,780
Gordon, M. O. (2002) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 · Cited by 2,626
Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the UnitedStates
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.477 · Cited by 2,616
Tunis (2003) · doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1624 · Cited by 1,724
Predictors of Long-term Progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Leske, M. C., Heijl, A., Hyman, L., Bengtsson, B., Dong, L., & Yang, Z. (2007) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016 · Cited by 1,363
Asrani, S., Zeimer, R., Wilensky, J., Gieser, D., Vitale, S., & Lindenmuth, K. (2000) · Journal of Glaucoma · doi:10.1097/00061198-200004000-00002 · Cited by 901
Racial Variations in the Prevalence of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey
Tielsch, J. M. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470030069026 · Cited by 879
Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma
Drance, S., Anderson, D. R., & Schulzer, M. (2001) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00964-3 · Cited by 790
Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East Baltimore
Sommer, A., Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J. C., Martone, J. F., Royall, R. M., Witt, K. A., & Ezrine, S. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111143252004 · Cited by 764
Cited by
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
Normal tension glaucoma: review of current understanding and mechanisms of the pathogenesis
Killer, H., & Pircher, A. (2018) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0042-2 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- De Moraes, C. G. V.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-05-12
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 562
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965921725
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in Treated Glaucoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.72
- The paper
- De Moraes, C. G. V. (2010). Risk Factors for Visual Field Progression in Treated Glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.72
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.