Cited by 139Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing Impairment and CommunicationEar Surgery and Otitis Media

Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants

Donaldson, Amy Isaacs, Heavner, Krista S., Zwolan, Teresa A.·2004·Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify progress after cochlear implantation for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of speech and language and speech perception test scores of children with autism who have received a cochlear implant at our center. SETTING: University of Michigan Medical Center, Cochlear Implant Program. PATIENTS: Six children, ages 3 to 16 years, who received cochlear implants at the our center. All children were diagnosed as having ASD by a neuropsychologist, either before or after receiving a cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children participated in preoperative and postoperative speech and language and speech perception testing. A survey was administered to parents to evaluate subjective impressions of cochlear implant benefit and quality of life before and after implantation. RESULTS: Improved scores were recorded for children on whom standardized expressive and receptive vocabulary testing was possible. Children who could not complete standardized tests demonstrated improvement in raw scores. Improvement on the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale was noted for the 4 of 7 children who completed the scale preoperatively and postoperatively. Survey results suggested changes in responsiveness to sound, interest in music, vocalization, and eye contact following implantation. Five of the 6 families indicated that they would recommend a cochlear implant to another family in a similar situation. CONCLUSIONS: Gains made by children in our study were small compared with the general implant population; however, when compared with themselves preoperatively, these children did demonstrate progress. Improvements in behaviors and interaction point to a quality of life benefit following implantation that is difficult to quantify.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archotol.130.5.666

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donaldson, A. I., Heavner, K. S., & Zwolan, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Donaldson, Amy Isaacs
Venue
Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
130
Issue
5
Pages
666
ISSN
0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964403100
Cited by
139
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Keywords
cochlear implants, autism spectrum disorder, children, speech and language development, speech perception, vocabulary, Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, quality of life, parental satisfaction
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Behavior, Child, Family Relations, Gestures, Humans, Language Development, Sign Language, Speech Perception, Vocabulary, Hearing Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review