The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-report tinnitus handicap measure that is brief, easy to administer and interpret, broad in scope, and psychometrically robust. DESIGN: A standardization study of a self-report tinnitus handicap measure was conducted to determine its internal consistency reliability and convergent and construct validity. SETTING: Audiology clinics in tertiary care centers in two sites. PARTICIPANTS: In the first investigation, 84 patients reporting tinnitus as their primary complaint or secondary to hearing loss completed the 45-item alpha version of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). In the second investigation, 66 subjects also reporting tinnitus completed the 25-item beta version. OUTCOME MEASURES: Convergent validity was assessed using another measure of perceived tinnitus handicap (Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire). Construct validity was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, symptom rating scales (annoyance, sleep disruption, depression, and concentration), and perceived tinnitus pitch and loudness judgments. RESULTS: From the alpha version of the THI, we derived a 25-item beta version with the items grouped into functional, emotional, and catastrophic subscales. The total scale yielded excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .93). No significant age or gender effects were seen. Weak correlations were observed between the THI and the Beck Depression Inventory, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, and pitch and loudness judgments. Significant correlations were found between the THI and the symptom rating scales. CONCLUSION: The THI is a self-report measure that can be used in a busy clinical practice to quantify the impact of tinnitus on daily living.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987) · Cited by 4,207
The Development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory
Jacobson, G. P., & Newman, C. W. (1990) · Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011 · Cited by 2,361
Self-citationStewart, A. L. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.262.7.907 · Cited by 2,085
The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a New Tool
Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-198205000-00006 · Cited by 1,116
The Medical Outcomes Study: An Application of Methods for Monitoring the Results of Medical Care
Tarlov, A. R. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430070073033 · Cited by 877
The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: Psychometric Adequacy and Audiometric Correlates
Newman, C. W., Weinstein, B. E., Jacobson, G. P., & Hug, G. A. (1990) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199012000-00004 · Cited by 563
Self-citationDifficulties Experienced by Tinnitus Sufferers
Tyler, R. S., & Baker, L. J. (1983) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.4802.150 · Cited by 525
The Psychometric Properties of a Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire
Kuk, F. K., Tyler, R. S., Russell, D., & Jordan, H. (1990) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199012000-00005 · Cited by 489
Cited by
The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and Validation
Jacobson, B. H., Johnson, A., Grywalski, C., Silbergleit, A., Jacobson, G., Benninger, M. S., & Newman, C. W. (1997) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66 · Cited by 2,574
Self-citationBaguley, D., McFerran, D., & Hall, D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7 · Cited by 1,245
Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss
Stachler, R. J., Chandrasekhar, S. S., Archer, S. M., Rosenfeld, R. M., Schwartz, S. R., Barrs, D. M., Brown, S. R., Fife, T. D., Ford, P., Ganiats, T. G., et al. (2012) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599812436449 · Cited by 971
Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update)
Chandrasekhar, S. S., Tsai Do, B. S., Schwartz, S. R., Bontempo, L. J., Faucett, E. A., Finestone, S. A., Hollingsworth, D. B., Kelley, D. M., Kmucha, S. T., Moonis, G., et al. (2019) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599819859885 · Cited by 931
The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus
Meikle, M. B., Henry, J. A., Griest, S. E., Stewart, B. J., Abrams, H. B., McArdle, R., Myers, P. J., Newman, C. W., Sandridge, S., Turk, D. C., et al. (2012) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31822f67c0 · Cited by 792
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, C. W., Jacobson, G. P., & Spitzer, J. B.
- Venue
- Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-148
- ISSN
- 0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036036397
- Cited by
- 2,074
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007
- The paper
- Newman, C. W., Jacobson, G. P., & Spitzer, J. B. (1996). Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.