The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teenaged Girls, Carbonated Beverage Consumption, and Bone Fractures
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the possible association between carbonated beverage consumption and bone fractures among teenaged girls given the awareness of the concern about the impact of carbonated beverage consumption on children's health. SETTING: An urban high school. METHODS: A cross-sectional (retrospective) study. Four hundred sixty 9th- and 10th-grade girls attending the high school participated in this study by completing a self-administered questionnaire relating to their physical activities and personal and behavioral practices. The school system and the Harvard School of Public Health Institutional Review Boards approved the study. The girls' self-reports on physical activity, carbonated beverage consumption, and bone fractures are analyzed. RESULTS: In the total sample, carbonated beverage consumption and bone fractures are associated: odds ratio = 3.14 (95% confidence limit, 1.45, 6.78), P = .004. Among physically active girls, the cola beverages, in particular, are highly associated with bone fractures: odds ratio = 4.94 (95% confidence limit, 1.79, 13.62), P = .002. CONCLUSIONS: The results reported confirm previous findings, but the mechanism by which cola drinks are associated with bone fractures in physically active girls has neither been fully explored nor determined. Nevertheless, national concern and alarm about the health impact of carbonated beverage consumption on teenaged girls is supported by the findings of this study. The results have policy implications for improving the dietary practices and health of children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review
Malik, V. S., Schulze, M. B., & Hu, F. B. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/84.2.274 · Cited by 2,100
Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vartanian, L. R., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2007) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.083782 · Cited by 1,863
Weaver, C. M., Gordon, C. M., Janz, K. F., Kalkwarf, H. J., Lappe, J. M., Lewis, R., O’Karma, M., Wallace, T. C., & Zemel, B. S. (2016) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3 · Cited by 1,378
Dhingra, R. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.9.879 · Cited by 861
Significant Vitamin D Deficiency in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Svoren, B. M., Volkening, L. K., Wood, J. R., & Laffel, L. M. B. (2009) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.07.015 · Cited by 187
Intestinal Absorption of Fructose
Ferraris, R. P., Choe, J.-Y., & Patel, C. R. (2018) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-082117-051707 · Cited by 180
Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ahn, H., & Park, Y. K. (2021) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-021-00698-1 · Cited by 56
Haque, M., McKimm, J., Sartelli, M., Samad, N., Haque, S. Z., & Bakar, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Population Therapeutics & Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.666 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Wyshak, G.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 610
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135393679
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.