CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 208Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Primary Care and Home-Based Intervention for Physical Activity and Nutrition Behaviors: PACE+ for Adolescents

Patrick, Kevin, Calfas, Karen J., Norman, Gregory J., Zabinski, Marion F., Sallis, James F., Rupp, Joan, Covin, Jennifer, Cella, John·2006·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
DOI 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many adolescents do not meet national guidelines for participation in regular moderate or vigorous physical activity (PA); limitations on sedentary behaviors; or dietary intake of fruits and vegetables, fiber, or total dietary fat. This study evaluated a health care-based intervention to improve these behaviors. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care with follow-up at home. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred seventy-eight adolescent girls and boys aged 11 to 15 years. INTERVENTIONS: Two experimental conditions: (1) Primary care, office-based, computer-assisted diet and PA assessment and stage-based goal setting followed by brief health care provider counseling and 12 months of monthly mail and telephone counseling and (2) a comparison condition addressing sun exposure protection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Minutes per week of moderate plus vigorous PA measured by self-report and accelerometer; self-report of days per week of PA and sedentary behaviors; and percentage of energy from fat and servings per day of fruits and vegetables measured by three 24-hour diet recalls. Body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Compared with adolescents in the sun protection condition, girls and boys in the diet and PA intervention significantly reduced sedentary behaviors (intervention vs control change, 4.3 to 3.4 h/d vs 4.2 to 4.4 h/d for girls, respectively [P = .001]; 4.2 to 3.2 h/d vs 4.2 to 4.3 h/d for boys, respectively [P = .001]). Boys reported more active days per week (intervention vs control change: 4.1 to 4.4 d/wk vs 3.8 to 3.8 d/w, respectively [P = .01]), and the number of servings of fruits and vegetables for girls approached significance (intervention vs control change, 3.5 to 4.2 servings/d vs 3.5 to 3.9 servings/d, respectively [P = .07]). No intervention effects were seen with percentage of calories from fat or minutes of PA per week. Percentage of adolescents meeting recommended health guidelines was significantly improved for girls for consumption of saturated fat (intervention vs control change, 23.4% to 41.0% vs 18.5% to 31%, respectively [relative risk, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.68]) and for boys' participation in d/wk of PA (intervention vs control change, 45.3% to 55.4% vs 41.9% to 38.0%, respectively [relative risk, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.75]). No between-group differences were seen in body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in some diet, PA, and sedentary behaviors in adolescents can be enabled through the use of a 1-year, integrated intervention using the computer, health provider counseling, mail, and telephone. The amount of intervention received may contribute to its efficacy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.128

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 208

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Patrick, K., Calfas, K. J., Norman, G. J., Zabinski, M. F., Sallis, J. F., Rupp, J., Covin, J., & Cella, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
ORCID
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
160
Issue
2
Pages
128
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archpedi.160.2.128
OpenAlex
W2134620602
Cited by
208
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA098861, R01CA081495)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
adolescent physical activity, sedentary behavior, nutrition behavior, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary fat intake, home-based counseling, telephone counseling, primary care intervention, goal setting, sun protection, body mass index, accelerometer-measured activity, computer-based testing, saturated fat intake, health behavior change, school-based intervention, family intervention, community-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Feeding Behavior, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Primary Health Care, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review