Cited by 472Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSports and Physical Education Studies

Compliance with physical activity guidelines: prevalence in a population of children and youth

Pate, R·2002·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose To use objective monitoring of physical activity to determine the percentages of children and youth in a population that met physical activity guidelines. Methods A total of 375 students in grades 1-12 wore an accelerometer (CSA 7164) for seven consecutive days. Bouts of continuous activity and accumulation of minutes spent in physical activity at various intensities were calculated to determine how many students met three physical activity guidelines. Results Over 90% of students met Healthy People 2010, Objective 22.6 and nearly 70% met the United Kingdom Expert Consensus Group guideline, both of which recommend daily accumulation of moderate physical activity. Less than 3% met Healthy People 2010, Objective 22.7, which calls for bouts of continuous vigorous physical activity. For the United Kingdom Expert Consensus Group guideline, compliance decreased markedly with age, but gender differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions Prevalence estimates for compliance with national physical activity guidelines varied markedly for the three guidelines examined. Objective monitoring of physical activity in youth appears to be feasible and may provide more accurate prevalence rates than self-report measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00263-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pate, R.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Pate, R
ORCID
Pate, R
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
303-308
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1518109232
Cited by
472
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
physical activity guidelines, guideline adherence, children and young people, accelerometer-measured activity, high-intensity exercise, moderate physical activity, Healthy People 2010, age differences, gender differences
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Child, Child Welfare, Data Collection, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Physical Fitness, Population Surveillance, Exercise, Prevalence, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review