Cited by 4,060Obesity, Physical Activity, DietCancer Risks and FactorsObesity and Health Practices

Prevalence and Trends in Overweight Among US Children and Adolescents, 1999-2000

Ogden, Cynthia L.·2002·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: The prevalence of overweight among children in the United States increased between 1976-1980 and 1988-1994, but estimates for the current decade are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of overweight in US children using the most recent national data with measured weights and heights and to examine trends in overweight prevalence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey of 4722 children from birth through 19 years of age with weight and height measurements obtained in 1999-2000 as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a cross-sectional, stratified, multistage probability sample of the US population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of overweight among US children by sex, age group, and race/ethnicity. Overweight among those aged 2 through 19 years was defined as at or above the 95th percentile of the sex-specific body mass index (BMI) for age growth charts. RESULTS: The prevalence of overweight was 15.5% among 12- through 19-year-olds, 15.3% among 6- through 11-year-olds, and 10.4% among 2- through 5-year-olds, compared with 10.5%, 11.3%, and 7.2%, respectively, in 1988-1994 (NHANES III). The prevalence of overweight among non-Hispanic black and Mexican-American adolescents increased more than 10 percentage points between 1988-1994 and 1999-2000. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of overweight among children in the United States is continuing to increase, especially among Mexican-American and non-Hispanic black adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.288.14.1728

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogden, C. L.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Ogden, Cynthia L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2002-10-09
Volume
288
Issue
14
Pages
1728
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2131454803
Cited by
4,060
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 165 · 2012: 236
FWCI
322.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
childhood obesity, overweight prevalence, adolescents, children, temporal trends, body mass index, Mexican American adolescents, non-Hispanic Black adolescents, racial and ethnic disparities, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review