The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Office-Based Motivational Interviewing to Prevent Childhood Obesity: A Feasibility Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pediatricians and dietitians can implement an office-based obesity prevention program using motivational interviewing as the primary intervention. DESIGN: Nonrandomized clinical trial. Fifteen pediatricians belonging to Pediatric Research in Office Settings, a national practice-based research network, and 5 registered dietitians were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control; (2) minimal intervention (pediatrician only); or (3) intensive intervention (pediatrician and registered dietitian). SETTING: Primary care pediatric offices. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one children presenting for well-child care visits met eligibility criteria of being aged 3 to 7 years and having a body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) at the 85th percentile or greater but lower than the 95th percentile for the age or having a normal weight and a parent with a body mass index of 30 or greater. INTERVENTIONS: Pediatricians and registered dietitians in the intervention groups received motivational interviewing training. Parents of children in the minimal intervention group received 1 motivational interviewing session from the physician, and parents of children in the intensive intervention group received 2 motivational interviewing sessions each from the pediatrician and the registered dietitian. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in the body mass index-for-age percentile. RESULTS: At 6 months' follow-up, there was a decrease of 0.6, 1.9, and 2.6 body mass index percentiles in the control, minimal, and intensive groups, respectively. The differences in body mass index percentile change between the 3 groups were nonsignificant (P=.85). The patient dropout rates were 2 (10%), 13 (32%), and 15 (50%) for the control, minimal, and intensive groups, respectively. Fifteen (94%) of the parents reported that the intervention helped them think about changing their family's eating habits. CONCLUSIONS: Motivational interviewing by pediatricians and dietitians is a promising office-based strategy for preventing childhood obesity. However, additional studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of this intervention in practice settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
James, J., Thomas, P., Cavan, D., & Kerr, D. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38077.458438.ee · Cited by 827
Resnicow, K., Jackson, A., Wang, T., De, A. K., McCarty, F., Dudley, W. N., & Baranowski, T. (2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.10.1686 · Cited by 495
Self-citation
Cited by
Flynn, J. T., Kaelber, D. C., Baker-Smith, C. M., Blowey, D., Carroll, A. E., Daniels, S. R., de Ferranti, S. D., Dionne, J. M., Falkner, B., Flinn, S. K., et al. (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2017-1904 · Cited by 3,651
Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors
Martins, R. K., & McNeil, D. W. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.02.001 · Cited by 584
Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control
Teixeira, P. J., Silva, M. N., Mata, J., Palmeira, A. L., & Markland, D. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-22 · Cited by 422
Brown, C. L., Halvorson, E. E., Cohen, G. M., Lazorick, S., & Skelton, J. A. (2015) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2015.05.013 · Cited by 210
Christie, D., & Channon, S. (2014) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.12195 · Cited by 180
Lord, S. P., Sheng, E., Imel, Z. E., Baer, J., & Atkins, D. C. (2015) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002 · Cited by 144
Bean, M. K., Powell, P., Quinoy, A., Ingersoll, K., Wickham, E. P., & Mazzeo, S. E. (2015) · Pediatric Obesity · doi:10.1111/j.2047-6310.2014.226.x · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, R. P., Hamre, R., Dietz, W. H., Wasserman, R. C., Slora, E. J., Myers, E. F., Sullivan, S., Rockett, H., Thoma, K. A., Dumitru, G., & Resnicow, K. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 495
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985706195
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.