Cited by 144Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsEmpathy and Medical EducationAction Observation and Synchronization

More than reflections: empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client.

Open access
Lord, Sarah Peregrine, Sheng, Elisa, Imel, Zac E., Baer, John, Atkins, David C.·2015·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Empathy is a basic psychological process that involves the development of synchrony in dyads. It is also a foundational ingredient in specific, evidence-based behavioral treatments like motivational interviewing (MI). Ratings of therapist empathy typically rely on a gestalt, "felt sense" of therapist understanding and the presence of specific verbal behaviors like reflective listening. These ratings do not provide a direct test of psychological processes like behavioral synchrony that are theorized to be an important component of empathy in psychotherapy. To explore a new objective indicator of empathy, we hypothesized that synchrony in language style (i.e., matching how statements are phrased) between client and therapists would predict gestalt ratings of empathy over and above the contribution of reflections. We analyzed 122 MI transcripts with high and low empathy ratings based on the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity global rating scale. Linguistic inquiry and word count was used to estimate language style synchrony (LSS) of adjacent client and therapist talk turns. High-empathy sessions showed greater LSS across 11 language style categories compared with low-empathy sessions (p<.01), and overall, average LSS was notably higher in high-empathy versus low-empathy sessions (d=0.62). Regression analyses showed that LSS was predictive of empathy ratings over and above reflection counts; a 1 SD increase in LSS is associated with a 2.4 times increase in the odds of a high-empathy rating, controlling for therapist reflections (odds ratio=2.4; 95% CI: 1.36; 4.24, p<.01). These findings suggest empathy ratings are related to synchrony in language style, over and above synchrony of content as measured by therapist reflections. Novel indicators of therapist empathy may have implications for the study of MI process as well as the training of therapists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2014.11.002

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rogers CR Koch S 1959 A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships: As developed in the client-centered framework New York, NY McGraw-Hill New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lord, S. P., Sheng, E., Imel, Z. E., Baer, J., & Atkins, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Lord, Sarah Peregrine
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
296-303
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995814612
Cited by
144
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da016360-03)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA018673)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01/DA016360, R34DA034860)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
empathy, motivational interviewing, reflective listening, implementation fidelity, therapist reflection, therapeutic process
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Empathy, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Verbal Behavior, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review