Cited by 584Behavioral Health and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Review of Motivational Interviewing in promoting health behaviors

Martins, Renata K., McNeil, Daniel W.·2009·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

There is considerable evidence for the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing (MI) in the treatment of substance abuse, as well as a number of other health behavior areas. The present paper summarizes and critically reviews the research in three emerging areas in which (MI) is being applied: diet and exercise, diabetes, and oral health. Although 10 prior reviews focused in part on MI studies in the areas of diet, exercise, or diabetes, the present paper provides an up-to-date review, and includes oral health as another emerging area of MI research. Overall, 37 articles were reviewed: 24 in the areas of diet and exercise, 9 in the area of diabetes, and 4 in the oral health area. Research in these areas suggests that (MI) is effective in all these health domains, although additional research is needed, particularly in the oral health arena. Specifically, future research in the areas of diet and exercise should examine the clinical utility of MI by health care professionals (other than dietitians), studies in the area of diabetes should continue to examine long-term effects of MI on glycemic control, and research in the area of oral health should focus on developing additional trials in this field. Further, future studies should demonstrate improved research methodology, and investigate the effects of possible outcome mediators, such as client change talk, on behavior change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.02.001

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martins, R. K., & McNeil, D. W.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Martins, Renata K.
  • McNeil, Daniel W.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
283-293
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991002414
Cited by
584
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 42
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
motivational interviewing, health behavior change, diet and exercise, diabetes mellitus, oral health, glycemic control, change talk
MeSH terms
Diet, Health Promotion, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Motivation, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review