Cited by 99Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFamily Support in Illness

Palliative Care of Children With Brain Tumors: A Parental Perspective

Open access
Zelcer, Shayna, Cataudella, Danielle, Cairney, A. Elizabeth L., Bannister, Susan L.·2010·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the end-of-life experience of children with brain tumors and their families. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of focus group interviews. SETTING: Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five parents of 17 children who had died of brain tumors. INTERVENTION: Parents participated in 3 semistructured focus group interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes identified through thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis identified 3 primary themes. (1) Parents described the dying trajectory of their child as characterized by progressive neurologic deterioration, with the loss of the ability to communicate as a turning point. Parental coping mechanisms included striving to maintain normality and finding spiritual strength through maintaining hope and in the resilience of their child. (2) Parental struggles during this phase included balancing competing responsibilities and speaking with their child about death. (3) Barriers to achieving a home death included suboptimal symptom management, financial and practical hardships, and inadequate community support. A fourth, secondary theme concerned the therapeutic benefits of the interview. CONCLUSION: The neurologic deterioration that characterizes the dying trajectory of children with brain tumors may create significant challenges for health care professionals and the children's parents, supporting the need for increased awareness of the distinct issues in the palliative care of children with brain tumors and for early anticipatory guidance provided for families.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.284

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bereaved parents' perspectives reveal a need for improved and cohesive care transitions, particularly in the form and feasibility of home care and respite support services knowledgeable on pediatric and adolescent psychosocial and symptom care needs.

    “Perspectives of bereaved parents reveal a need for improved and cohesive care transitions, particularly in the form and feasibility of home care and respite support services knowledgeable on pediatric and adolescent psychosocial and symptom care needs.[17,40–42]”

    From Palliative Care as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Ana- lyzing Data in Qualitative Research. New York, NY: New York University Press; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zelcer, S., Cataudella, D., Cairney, A. E. L., & Bannister, S. L.
Affiliations
London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
164
Issue
3
Pages
225
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028110907
Cited by
99
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
pediatric brain tumors, palliative care, end-of-life care, parental coping, neurological deterioration, communication loss, anticipatory guidance, home death, symptom management, family support
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Death, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Infant, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Parents, Focus Groups, Spirituality, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review