Cited by 238Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Palliative Care as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology

Open access
Weaver, Meaghann S., Heinze, Katherine E., Kelly, Katherine P., Wiener, Lori, Casey, Robert L., Bell, Cynthia J., Wolfe, Joanne, Garee, Amy M. +2 more·2015·Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract

Systematic review of pediatric and adolescent palliative cancer care literature from 1995 to 2015 to inform development of a palliative care psychosocial standard.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pbc.25695

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

27 of 84 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Communication regarding planning, rather than actual location of death, may be a more relevant outcome.

    “The opportunity to plan location of death is associated with high quality palliative care and may suggest that communication regarding planning rather than actual location of death may be a more relevant outcome.[19,43]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] source

      The Methods > Parental survey section says location of death was collected, but does not discuss planning that location. The Discussion addresses conversations about hastening death and symptom management, not whether communication about location planning is a more relevant palliative-care outcome than actual location of death. Searches for location-of-death planning and palliative-care quality found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [43] source
  • Findingcitation

    Parents of children with cancer perceive accurate, clear, and understandable communication as beneficial.

    “Interviews with parents of children with cancer reveal that they perceive accurate, clear, and understandable communication as beneficial.[17,31,32]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [17] source
    • cites [31] source
    • cites [32] source
  • Findingcitation

    Families whose primary oncologist clearly explained treatment options during their child's end-of-life care and who involved home-care services were more likely to plan for the child's location of death.

    “Relatedly, families whose primary oncologist clearly explained treatment options during their child’s end of life care and who involved home-care services were more likely to plan for child’s location of death.[19]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] source

      The Methods > Parental survey passage says location of death was collected, while the Implications/Conclusions discuss explaining symptom-management options in relation to considerations of hastening death. Neither passage reports whether oncologists’ explanations or home-care services were associated with planning the child’s location of death. Searches for home-care services, planned location of death, and explained treatment options found no such result in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    The opportunity to plan location of death is associated with high-quality palliative care.

    “The opportunity to plan location of death is associated with high quality palliative care and may suggest that communication regarding planning rather than actual location of death may be a more relevant outcome.[19,43]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] source

      The Methods (Parental survey; page unavailable) say that location of death was collected, but do not address whether parents had an opportunity to plan it. The Discussion (page unavailable) concerns planning symptom-management options, not an association between planning the location of death and high-quality palliative care. Searches for planned place or location of death and palliative-care quality found no passage making that association. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [43] source
  • Findingcitation

    Perceived cost and lack of sufficient time are the most frequently cited barriers to introducing palliative care concepts.

    “Perceived cost[15,44–51] and lack of sufficient time [33,37,47,51–53] are the most frequently cited barriers to introducing palliative care concepts, thus warranting consideration of reimbursement for palliative care conversations and services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [15] source
    • cites [44] source

      The 'Introducing palliative care' guidance (p. 16) identifies lack of communication about illness trajectory as a barrier, but does not identify perceived cost or insufficient time as barriers. The palliative-care discussion (p. 33) also does not say these are the most frequently cited barriers; searches for cost, time, and reimbursement did not establish that claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [45] source
    • cites [46] source
    • cites [47] source
    • cites [48] source
    • cites [49] source
    • cites [50] source
    • cites [51] source
    • cites [33] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • May combine two claims. 9
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Communication between the medical team and patient and family, ongoing assessment of patient and family needs, developmentally informed interventions, and tangible support during inpatient and home care transitions are target areas where comprehensive care could be improved through a palliative care standard.

    “Specifically, communication between the medical team and the patient and family; ongoing assessment of patient and family needs; developmentally informed interventions; and tangible support during times of inpatient and home care transition are target areas in which comprehensive care could be improved through a standard of palliative care.[6,7]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [7] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A systematic review of empirically based end-of-life publications in pediatrics found that of 26 publications, only four (15.4%) included patient-reported outcomes, six (23.1%) included parent-only-reported outcomes, and five (19.2%) included staff-only-reported outcomes.

    “A systematic review of empirically based end of life publications in pediatrics found that of 26 publications, only four (15.4%) included patient-reported outcomes, six (23.1%) included parent only-reported outcomes, and five (19.2%) included staff only-reported outcomes.[23]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] source

      The review summary (p. 1) reports the stated counts and percentages among 26 eligible publications. Its scope was end-of-life research in pediatric oncology, however, not pediatrics generally as the citing sentence suggests. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Provider discomfort with palliative care conversations and misconceptions that palliative care is only beneficial when treatment is no longer effective are barriers.

    “Additional barriers include provider discomfort with palliative care conversations,[2,19,23,38,57] or misconceptions regarding palliative care as only beneficial when treatment is no longer effective[32,58,59] both of which may benefit from clarity in palliative care guidelines.[60]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [2] source
    • cites [19] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says physicians find conversations about hastening death highly challenging, offering limited support for the provider-discomfort part. It does not say providers are uncomfortable with palliative care conversations generally, or that people believe palliative care is beneficial only after treatment stops working. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [38] source
    • cites [57] source
    • cites [32] source

      The discussion describes parents’ desire for clear information and opportunities to discuss care goals, but does not identify provider discomfort as a barrier. Searches for discomfort with palliative-care conversations and for the belief that palliative care helps only after treatment fails found neither claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [58] source
    • cites [59] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The target population for palliative care includes patients and individuals formative in the child's social and relational spheres, such as siblings, parents or guardians, grandparents, or other extended relatives.

    “The target population for palliative care includes not only patients but also those individuals identified as formative in the child’s social and relational spheres, whether siblings, parents or guardians, grandparents, or other extended relatives.[15,31,40,52,61]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [15] source
    • cites [31] source
    • cites [40] source
    • cites [52] source

      The Introduction describes psychosocial support for children with cancer and their families, and the Support groups and bereavement support section lists groups for patients, parents, siblings, and grandparents. The paper does not define the target population for palliative care; its findings concern psychosocial support at UK paediatric oncology centres. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [61] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The recommendation is overall strong given the risk-benefit ratio, including significant health impact on bereaved family members and positive outcomes with earlier integration of palliative care and end-of-life care.

    “This is an overall strong recommendation given risk-benefit ratio including significant health impact on bereaved family members and positive outcomes with earlier integration of palliative care and end of life care.[2,6,51]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [2] source
    • cites [6] source

      The Synthesis of Second Order Findings links a child’s end-of-life care with bereaved parents’ psychosocial outcomes and long-term grief. The Synthesis of Third Order Findings says early integration of palliative services has the potential to improve child and family health, but does not establish the claimed positive outcomes specifically from earlier integration. The paper supports the rationale for the citing authors’ recommendation, though not that stronger outcome claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [51] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The review screened 209 papers and included 73 papers in the final synthesis.

    “A total of 209 papers were reviewed with inclusion of 73 papers for final synthesis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Palliative care for pediatric cancer patients and their families varies across settings and resources and has only recently included access to services similar to those offered to adult cancer patients.

    “A review of the literature suggests that palliative care for pediatric cancer patients and their families varies across settings and resources and has only recently included access to services similar to those offered to adult cancer patients.[5]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    These psychosocial symptoms often increase with disease progression and are often untreated.

    “These psychosocial symptoms often increase in the setting of disease progression and are often untreated.[16]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Children and adolescents with cancer may wish to talk about the meaning of being ill, particularly prognosis, and care team involvement in these conversations may be important for individual children and parents.

    “Children and adolescents with cancer may wish to talk about the meaning of being ill, particularly prognosis; and care team involvement in these conversations may be important for individual children[2] and parents.[26]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] source
    • cites [26] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Symptom burden assessment with subsequent intervention and effective communication are associated with improved psychosocial outcomes for pediatric cancer patients and their families.

    “As a minimum, symptom burden assessment with subsequent intervention and effective communication must be prioritized, as these tenets are associated with improved psychosocial outcomes for pediatric cancer patients and their families.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance recognizes integrating palliative care as a human right for children even in resource-limited health system settings.

    “The Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance recognizes the importance of integrating palliative care as a human right for children even in resource-limited health system settings,[4]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study team included geographically diverse representatives from oncology, palliative care and hospice, psychology, nursing, and social work.

    “The study team included geographically diverse representatives from the fields of oncology, palliative care and hospice, psychology, nursing, and social work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    A standard of early integration of palliative care for children and adolescents with cancer means whole-person, whole-family support regardless of anticipated disease trajectory.

    “A standard of early integration of palliative care for children and adolescents with cancer translates into whole-person, whole-family support regardless of anticipated disease trajectory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The American Academy of Pediatrics advocates for an integrated, interdisciplinary approach in which palliative care components are offered at diagnosis and continued throughout illness, whether the outcome is cure or death.

    “The American Academy of Pediatrics advocates for an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to competent and compassionate care: “in which the components of palliative care are offered at diagnosis and continued throughout the course of illness, whether the outcome ends in cure or death.”[3]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Early integration of palliative care as a standard across sites and settings provides an opportunity to address physical domains and the psychological, developmental, and spiritual impact of illness within the patient's family and community.

    “The early integration of palliative care as a standard across sites and settings provides meaningful opportunity to care for not only the physical domains impacted by cancer, but to also attend to the full impact of illness on the patient’s psychological, developmental, and spiritual wellness within the social context of each patient’s family and community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two medical librarians independently approved the search strategies.

    “Two medical librarians independently approved the search strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    External review improved awareness of standard feasibility in resource-limited settings and led to inclusion of 14 additional papers with psychosocial emphasis.

    “External review resulted in improved awareness of standard feasibility in resource-limited settings and inclusion of 14 additional papers with psychosocial emphasis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Expert opinion from the SIOP Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries Palliative Care Working Group provided the reviewer team with additional global perspective.

    “Expert opinion from members of the SIOP Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries Palliative Care Working Group provided the reviewer team with additional global perspective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    An external team of expert pediatric oncologists and child psychologists externally reviewed the recommendation before the final draft.

    “An external team of expert pediatric oncologists and child psychologists externally reviewed the recommendation prior to final draft.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weaver, M. S., Heinze, K. E., Kelly, K. P., Wiener, L., Casey, R. L., Bell, C. J., Wolfe, J., Garee, A. M., Watson, A., & Hinds, P. S.
Affiliations
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Weaver, Meaghann S.
Venue
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12
Volume
62
Issue
S5
Pages
S829-33
ISSN
  • 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5017
OpenAlex
W2227826674
Cited by
238
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Children's National Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
palliative care, pediatric oncology, adolescent cancer, symptom assessment, patient-reported outcomes, communication, shared decision-making, quality of care, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Medical Oncology, Palliative Care, Pediatrics, Psychology, Hospice Care, Standard of Care, Palliative Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review