Cited by 60Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm Care

A Randomized Trial of Single Home Nursing Visits vs Office-Based Care After Nursery/Maternity Discharge: The Nurses for Infants Through Teaching and Assessment After the Nursery (NITTANY) Study

Paul, Ian M.·2012·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

Objective To compare office-based care (OBC) with a care model using a home nursing visit (HNV) as the initial postdischarge encounter for "well" breastfeeding newborns and mothers. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting A single academic hospital. Participants A total of 1154 postpartum mothers intending to breastfeed and their 1169 newborns of at least 34 weeks' gestation. Interventions Home nursing visits were scheduled no later than 2 days after discharge; OBC timing was physician determined. Outcome measures Mothers completed telephone surveys at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was unplanned health care utilization for mothers and newborns within 2 weeks of delivery. Other newborn outcomes were proportion seen within 2 days after discharge and breastfeeding duration. Maternal mental health, parenting competence, and satisfaction with care outcomes were assessed. Analyses followed an intent-to-treat paradigm. Results At 2 weeks, hospital readmissions and emergency department visits were uncommon, and there were no study group differences in these outcomes or with unplanned outpatient visit frequency. Newborns in the HNV group were seen no more than 2 days after discharge more commonly than those in the OBC group (85.9% vs 78.8%) (P = .002) and were more likely to be breastfeeding at 2 weeks (92.3% vs 88.6%) (P = .04) and 2 months (72.1% vs 66.4%) (P = .05) but not 6 months. No group differences were detected for maternal mental health or satisfac…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.198

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the comparison of home versus facility postnatal care, the pooled risk ratio for infant emergency health care visits (non-prespecified outcome) was 1.15 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.38), with no statistically significant difference (Z = 1.45, P = 0.15).

    “1.15 [0.95 , 1.38]”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Paul 2012

  • For the outcome infant emergency health care visits, heterogeneity across the three included studies was low (Tau2 = 0.00; Chi2 = 1.04, df = 2, P = 0.59; I2 = 0%).

    “Heterogeneity: Tau² = 0.00; | Chi² = 1.04, df = 2 (P = | | 0.59); | I² = 0%”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Paul 2012

  • In the comparison of home versus facility postnatal care, the pooled risk ratio for infant hospital readmissions (non-prespecified outcome) was 1.16 (95% CI 0.57 to 2.36), with no statistically significant difference (Z = 0.40, P = 0.69).

    “1.16”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Paul 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paul, I. M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Paul, Ian M.
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
263
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060677327
Cited by
60
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R40 MC 06630)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
home-visit nursing, postpartum care, breastfeeding duration, neonatal care, hospital readmission, emergency department visits, parenting competence, maternal mental health, patient satisfaction, postpartum women
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Female, Health Services, Home Care Services, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Length of Stay, Office Visits, Patient Discharge, Postnatal Care, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review