Cited by 128Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm Care

A randomized comparison of home and clinic follow-up visits after early postpartum hospital discharge

Lieu, Tracy A., Braveman, Paula A., Escobar, Gabriel J., Fischer, Allen F., Jensvold, Nancy G., Capra, Angela M.·2000·Pediatrics

Abstract

Background Recently enacted federal legislation mandates insurance coverage of at least 48 hours of postpartum hospitalization, but most mothers and newborns in the United States will continue to go home before the third postpartum day. National guidelines recommend a follow-up visit on the third or fourth postpartum day, but scant evidence exists about whether home or clinic visits are more effective. Methods We enrolled 1163 medically and socially low-risk mother-newborn pairs with uncomplicated delivery and randomly assigned them to receive home visits by nurses or pediatric clinic visits by nurse practitioners or physicians on the third or fourth postpartum day. In contrast with the 20-minute pediatric clinic visits, the home visits were longer (median: 70 minutes), included preventive counseling about the home environment, and included a physical examination of the mother. Clinical utilization and costs were studied using computerized databases. Breastfeeding continuation, maternal depressive symptoms, and maternal satisfaction were assessed by means of telephone interviews at 2 weeks' postpartum. Results Comparing the 580 pairs in the home visit group and the 583 pairs in the pediatric clinic visit group, no significant differences occurred in clinical outcomes as measured by maternal or newborn rehospitalization within 10 days postpartum, maternal or newborn urgent clinic visits within 10 days postpartum, or breastfeeding discontinuation or maternal depressive symptoms…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.105.5.1058

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Lieu 2000, the primary outcome was not pre-defined in the methods.

    “The primary outcome was not pre-defined in the methods.”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Lieu 2000

  • For Lieu 2000, many baseline characteristics were unbalanced (race, education, household income, initiated prenatal care in first trimester).

    “Many baseline characteristics were unbalanced (race, education, household income, initiated prenatal care in first trimester).”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Lieu 2000

  • For Lieu 2000, declarations of interest were unclear because no information was provided.

    “Declarations of interest: unclear by no information”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Lieu 2000

  • For Lieu 2000, other bias was at high risk.

    “Many baseline characteristics were unbalanced (race, education, household income, initiated prenatal care in first trimester).”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Lieu 2000

  • For Lieu 2000, selective reporting was at high risk of bias.

    “The primary outcome was not pre-defined in the methods.”

    From Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period (2021) · cites this paper as Lieu 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lieu, T. A., Braveman, P. A., Escobar, G. J., Fischer, A. F., Jensvold, N. G., & Capra, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Walnut Creek, California, and
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
1058-1065
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2066267123
Cited by
128
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
postpartum follow-up, home visits, breastfeeding continuation, maternal depressive symptoms, maternal satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Length of Stay, Patient Discharge, Postnatal Care, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review