Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Follow-Up Studies in Obsessional Neurosis

Goodwin, Donald W.·1969·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

The follow-up is the great exposer of truth, the rock on which many fine theories are wrecked and upon which better ones can be built; it is to the psychiatrist what the postmortem is to the physician. —P. D. Scott THE CAUSE of most medical and psychiatric illnesses is unknown. Even without knowledge of etiology, however, the physician can diagnose, predict and treat. To accomplish this he may rely to some extent on personal experience, but this alone is rarely sufficient. A knowledge of "the literature" is usually essential. Especially helpful are follow-up studies: published reports of groups of patients having similar symptoms followed over time to determine both "natural" outcome and outcome as influenced by treatment. To illustrate their usefulness we have reviewed follow-up studies pertaining to one illness, obsessive compulsive neurosis, and summarized the findings. Of the 13 studies reviewed,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740140054006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Goodwin, D. W.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1969-02-01
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
182
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015140441
Cited by
214
References
0
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follow-Up Studies in Obsessional Neurosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740140054006
The paper
Goodwin, D. W. (1969). Follow-Up Studies in Obsessional Neurosis. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740140054006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.