The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Response to Chlorpromazine, Imipramine, and Placebo: A Study of Subgroups of Hospitalized Depressed Patients
Abstract
A MAJOR aim of the present study was to examine the differential effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine among various depression subgroups. Tests were made of differential drug effects among Overall et al's1three empirically derived depressive subtypes, ie, anxious, hostile, and withdrawn-retarded depressives. These investigators found a tranquilizer, thioridazine, best for their anxious depressives and imipramine best for the withdrawn-retarded depressives. An examination was also made of differential drug effects among psychotic depressives, neurotic depressives, and schizophrenics with depression. As there is a tendency in this country to equate psychotic depression with endogenous depression, study findings may have some relevance for the endogenous-neurotic distinction. Proponents of this distinction have reported that imipramine is especially efficacious for endogenous depression and of little value in neurotic depressions.2-12 Finally, tests were made of differential drug effects among depressed patients categorized on the basis of sex and age (below 40 and 40 and
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
COMFORT, EFFECTIVENESS, AND SELF-AWARENESS AS CRITERIA OF IMPROVEMENT IN PSYCHOTHERAPY
PARLOFF, M. B., KELMAN, H. C., & FRANK, J. D. (1954) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.111.5.343 · Cited by 459
Cited by
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830190102 · Cited by 4,604
Rush, A. J., Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Hollon, S. (1977) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173502 · Cited by 913
Residual symptoms after partial remission: an important outcome in depression
Paykel, E. S., Ramana, R., Cooper, Z., Hayhurst, H., Kerr, J., & Barocka, A. (1995) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700033146 · Cited by 791
Cognitive Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Depression: Singly and in Combination
Hollon, S. D. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100018004 · Cited by 481
Cooper, P. J., Campbell, E. A., Day, A., Kennerley, H., & Bond, A. (1988) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.152.6.799 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Raskin, A.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1970-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049939290
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Response to Chlorpromazine, Imipramine, and Placebo: A Study of Subgroups of Hospitalized Depressed Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01750020068009
- The paper
- Raskin, A. (1970). Differential Response to Chlorpromazine, Imipramine, and Placebo: A Study of Subgroups of Hospitalized Depressed Patients. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01750020068009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
