Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Response to Chlorpromazine, Imipramine, and Placebo: A Study of Subgroups of Hospitalized Depressed Patients

Raskin, Allen·1970·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01750020068009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A MAJOR aim of the present study was to examine the differential effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine among various depression subgroups. Tests were made of differential drug effects among Overall et al's1three empirically derived depressive subtypes, ie, anxious, hostile, and withdrawn-retarded depressives. These investigators found a tranquilizer, thioridazine, best for their anxious depressives and imipramine best for the withdrawn-retarded depressives. An examination was also made of differential drug effects among psychotic depressives, neurotic depressives, and schizophrenics with depression. As there is a tendency in this country to equate psychotic depression with endogenous depression, study findings may have some relevance for the endogenous-neurotic distinction. Proponents of this distinction have reported that imipramine is especially efficacious for endogenous depression and of little value in neurotic depressions.2-12 Finally, tests were made of differential drug effects among depressed patients categorized on the basis of sex and age (below 40 and 40 and

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01750020068009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Raskin, A.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1970-08-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
164
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01750020068009
OpenAlex
W2049939290
Cited by
301
References
2
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.