Cited by 117Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Withdrawal From Methadone Maintenance: Rate of Withdrawal and Expectation

Senay, Edward C.·1977·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

One hundred twenty-seven successfully methadone-hydrochloride-maintained patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four groups and studied for 30 weeks: (1) known maintenance-patients were maintained on methadone under open conditions; (2) blind maintenance-patients were maintained on methadone under double blind conditions; (3) rapid withdrawal-patients were withdrawn under double-blind conditions at a rate of 10% of initial dose per week; (4) gradual withdrawal-patients were withdrawn under double-blind conditions at a rate of 3% of initial dose per week. Differences in dropout rates, illicit drug use, symptoms scores, and requests for study interruption indicate that withdrawal from methadone maintenance should be carried out at approximately 3% of initial dose per week. Better patient preparation also is indicated to reduce the effects of expectation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770150119014

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because 47% of patients were still unable to achieve opioid cessation at a reduction rate of 3%/week, an even slower reduction schedule might improve cessation rates further.

    “As 47% of patients were still unable to achieve opioid cessation at a reduction rate of 3%/week, it may be that an even slower reduction schedule might improve cessation rates further. 35”
  • Deviation from the protocol did not occur at high doses (greater than 2 mg/day of methadone) but started to occur when doses approached 2 mg/day of methadone, with most patients refusing a linear rate of reduction completely at 1.5 mg/day of methadone.

    “Deviation from the protocol did not occur at high doses (greater than 2 mg/day of methadone) but started to occur when doses approached 2 mg/day of methadone, with most patients refusing a linear rate of reduction completely at 1.5 mg/day of methadone. 35”
  • The hyperbolic relationship between dose and activity may explain why in studies that have employed linear tapers patients do not comply with the dose tapering regimen, and instead modify the process to more readily fit a hyperbolic pattern.

    “This hyperbolic relationship between dose and activity may explain why in studies that have employed linear tapers (e.g. 10% of the original dose per week) patients do not comply with the dose tapering regimen, and instead modify the process to more readily fit a hyperbolic pattern (Figure 3). 35”
  • In an older study, patients tapered by 3% of their original dose per week had reduced dropout rates, less illicit drug use, lower withdrawal symptom scores, and fewer requests for study interruption compared with patients tapered by 10% of their original dose per week.

    “This is consistent with the findings of an older study that found reduced dropout rates, less illicit drug use, lower withdrawal symptom scores and fewer requests for study interruption in patients tapered by 3% of their original dose per week (53% achieved opioid cessation) compared with 10% of their original dose per week (24% achieved opioid cessation). 35”
  • In an older study, 53% of patients tapered by 3% of their original dose per week achieved opioid cessation compared with 24% of patients tapered by 10% of their original dose per week.

    “This is consistent with the findings of an older study that found reduced dropout rates, less illicit drug use, lower withdrawal symptom scores and fewer requests for study interruption in patients tapered by 3% of their original dose per week (53% achieved opioid cessation) compared with 10% of their original dose per week (24% achieved opioid cessation). 35”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senay, E. C.
Corresponding author
Senay, Edward C.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1977-03-01
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
361
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989126239
Cited by
117
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
methadone maintenance treatment, opioid use disorder, opioid withdrawal, dropout rates, illicit drug use, withdrawal symptoms, patient preparation, expectancy effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Male, Methadone, Patient Dropouts, Placebos, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review