The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Clinical Implications of Primary Diagnostic Groups Among Alcoholics
Abstract
Interviews with patients and two resource persons were used to determine primary psychiatric diagnoses in 577 consecutive men entering an alcohol treatment program (ATP) at a veterans hospital. Twelve months later, about 95% of the sample were successfully followed up with a patient and resource person interview to establish the clinical course over the year for the four most populous diagnostic subgroups. At intake into the treatment program, the 432 group 1 primary alcoholic men were older, had a later age at onset of alcoholism, demonstrated a lower intensity of drinking, had fewer antisocial problems, and used fewer categories of drugs than the 60 men in group 2 with primary drug abuse and the 40 men in group 3 with primary antisocial personality disorder. During the follow-up, men in groups 2 and 3 had a greater likelihood of drug use, more police and social problems, and demonstrated higher (more adverse) outcomes on a clinical outcome scale. The nine group 4 men with primary affective disorder at intake demonstrated an increased risk for past suicide attempts and psychiatric care and had a higher rate of affective disorder in first-degree family members. These findings underscore the importance of distinguishing between symptoms (eg, sadness or antisocial problems) and diagnoses and the need to establish primary and secondary labels in substance abusers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism
(1994) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.151.2.184 · Cited by 826
Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis
Markou, A. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(97)00113-9 · Cited by 767
Psychiatric and Substance Use Comorbidity Among Treatment-Seeking Opioid Abusers
Brooner, R. K. (1997) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830130077015 · Cited by 746
Psychopathology as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Alcoholics
Rounsaville, B. J. (1987) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180015002 · Cited by 664
An 8-year follow-up of 450 sons of alcoholic and control subjects
Schuckit, M. A. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830030020005 · Cited by 627
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuckit, M. A.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1985-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1043
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089368130
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical Implications of Primary Diagnostic Groups Among Alcoholics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790340021003
- The paper
- Schuckit, M. A. (1985). The Clinical Implications of Primary Diagnostic Groups Among Alcoholics. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790340021003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.