Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neuropsychological Functioning in Siblings Discordant for Schizophrenia and Healthy Volunteers

Cannon, Tyrone D.·1994·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether schizophrenics and their nonschizophrenic siblings have a similar pattern of neuropsychological deficit when compared with normal controls. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen probands with schizophrenia, 16 of their nonschizophrenic siblings, and 31 unrelated, demographically balanced, normal individuals underwent evaluation with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. All subjects were screened for history of head injury, neurologic illness, major medical conditions, substance use, and axis I psychiatric disorders other than schizophrenia. Probands underwent evaluation twice: once at intake when half had never received neuroleptic medication and the other half had received none for a minimum of 2 weeks, and again at the 2- to 4-week follow-up, after stabilization with neuroleptic medications. RESULTS: Both schizophrenics and their nonschizophrenic siblings were impaired neuropsychologically compared with normal controls, with the nonschizophrenic siblings' performance intermediate between that of the schizophrenic siblings and the normal controls on all measures of functioning. The shapes of the deficit profiles of schizophrenic patients and their siblings were similar; in patients, verbal memory, abstraction, attention, and language functions were significantly more affected compared with spatial abilities, spatial memory, and sensory-motor functions, with a nonsignificant trend in the same direction in siblings. Cognitive functioning in patients was found to be stable across changes in medication status and clinical state. Four fifths of patients obtained more deviant scores than their nonschizophrenic siblings. Among the sibling group, those with probable and certain diagnoses of schizotypal personality disorder were more impaired compared with those without schizophrenia-spectrum symptoms. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that impaired information processing aggregates in the family members of schizophrenics and may serve as an indicator of genetic vulnerability to the disorder. Further work is needed to establish whether particular areas of functioning are selectively impaired in relatives and to determine whether the performance deficits are mediated by structural and/or metabolic disturbances in specific brain regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950080063009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Cannon, T. D.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
651
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980676990
Cited by
350
References
0
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological Functioning in Siblings Discordant for Schizophrenia and Healthy Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950080063009
The paper
Cannon, T. D. (1994). Neuropsychological Functioning in Siblings Discordant for Schizophrenia and Healthy Volunteers. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950080063009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.