Cited by 919Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria

Green, Michael F., Nuechterlein, Keith H., Gold, James M., Barch, Deanna M., Cohen, Jonathan, Essock, Susan, Fenton, Wayne S., Frese, Fred +9 more·2004·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

To stimulate the development of new drugs for the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) established the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative. This article presents an overview of decisions from the first MATRICS consensus conference. The goals of the meeting were to 1) identify the cognitive domains that should be represented in a consensus cognitive battery and 2) prioritize key criteria for selection of tests for the battery. Seven cognitive domains were selected based on a review of the literature and input from experts: working memory, attention/vigilance, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, reasoning and problem solving, speed of processing, and social cognition. Based on discussions at this meeting, five criteria were considered essential for test selection: good test-retest reliability, high utility as a repeated measure, relationship to functional outcome, potential response to pharmacologic agents, and practicality/tolerability. The results from this meeting constitute the initial steps for reaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.06.023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To avoid arbitrary definitions of cognitive domains, the authors based their seven domains on the guidelines of the two most commonly used cognitive test batteries.

    “To avoid that the definition of cognitive domains would be arbitrary, we based our seven domains on the guidelines of the two most commonly used cognitive test batteries (Green et al., 2004; Litvan et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, M. F., Nuechterlein, K. H., Gold, J. M., Barch, D. M., Cohen, J., Essock, S., Fenton, W. S., Frese, F., Goldberg, T. E., Heaton, R. K., Keefe, R. S. E., Kern, R. S., Kraemer, H., Stover, E., Weinberger, D. R., Zalcman, S., & Marder, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Michael F.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
301-307
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983805722
Cited by
919
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh022006-001)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH22006)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, cognitive battery, cognitive domain, test selection criteria, working memory, attention, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, reasoning and problem solving, processing speed, social cognition, test-retest reliability, clinical trial outcome measures, consensus conference
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Cognition Disorders, Consensus Statements as Topic, Humans, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), Neuropsychological Tests, Research Design, Schizophrenia, United States, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review