The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Volume-outcome relations have been established for several complex therapies. However, few studies have examined volume-outcome relations for high-risk procedures in general surgery, such as hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between hospital volume and outcome for patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All acute-care hospitals in California. PATIENTS: Hospital discharge data were analyzed for each patient in California who underwent major hepatic resection for HCC from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1994. Hospitals were grouped according to number of hepatectomies performed at each center during the 5-year study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included operative mortality and length of hospital stay. Regression analyses were used to adjust for differences in patient mix. RESULTS: Five hundred seven patients underwent hepatectomy for HCC during the study. Hepatic resections were performed in 138 hospitals, with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 14.8%. Three quarters of patients were treated at hospitals that average 3 or fewer hepatic resections for HCC per year. These low-volume providers represent 97.1% of all hospitals treating patients with HCC statewide. Significant reductions in risk-adjusted operative mortality rates (22.7%-9.4%; P = .002, multiple logistic regression) and risk-adjusted length of stay (14.3-11.3 days; P = .03, multiple linear regression) were observed as hospital volume increased. CONCLUSIONS: Low operative mortality and length of stay were associated with high-volume centers. These data support regionalization of high-risk procedures in general surgery, such as hepatectomy for HCC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome
Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5714 · Cited by 608
Long-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers
Fong, Y., Gonen, M., Rubin, D., Radzyner, M., & Brennan, M. F. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000184190.20289.4b · Cited by 398
The Effect of Clustering of Outcomes on the Association of Procedure Volume and Surgical Outcomes
Panageas, K. S., Schrag, D., Riedel, E., Bach, P. B., & Begg, C. B. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-8-200310210-00009 · Cited by 305
Ogola, G. O., Haider, A., & Shafi, S. (2017) · Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery · doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000001355 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasgow, R. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115749783
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.134.1.30
- The paper
- Glasgow, R. E. (1999). The Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.134.1.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.