Cited by 435Minimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesHernia repair and managementIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Trocar site hernia

Tonouchi, Hitoshi·2004·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of trocar site hernias seeking to confirm the definition of trocar site hernias by classification. DATA SOURCES: We searched this subject in English on MEDLINE by combining the words "trocar," "port," "hernia, and "laparoscopy."Data Extraction and STUDY SELECTION: We limited the main operations to cholecystectomy, colon and rectal surgery, fundoplication, and gastric surgery; finding 44 reports on these procedures. Of these, 19 were case reports, 18 were original articles (setting criteria; the incidence of the trocar site hernia was clarified, and involved >100 patients), and 7 technical notes on "how to do it" were collected. We obtained 19 additional reports using the references of those previously obtained. We, thus, reviewed 63 reports (24 case reports, 27 original articles, 7 technical notes, and 5 review articles). DATA SYNTHESIS: Trocar site hernia was classified into 3 types. The early-onset type that occurred immediately after the operation, with a small-bowel obstruction, especially the Richter hernia, frequently developing. The late-onset type that occurred several months after the operation, mostly with local abdominal bulging with no small-bowel obstruction developing. The special type that occurred indicated the protrusion of the intestine and/or omentum. Trocar site hernias with fascial defects of 10 mm or larger should be closed, including the peritoneum. Opinion varied if a 5-mm trocar site defect should be closed. CONCLUSION: It is useful to clearly classify trocar site hernias to improve management of laparoscopic procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1248

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Port-site hernia has been classified into three types: early, late, and special.

    “Though it has not been generally adopted, PSH has been classified into three types: early (dehiscence of fascial planes and peritoneum), late (dehiscence of the fascial plane with intact peritoneal hernia sac), and special (dehiscence of the entire abdominal wall) [30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tonouchi, H.
Affiliations
Mie University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tonouchi, Hitoshi
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
139
Issue
11
Pages
1248
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046305316
Cited by
435
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Keywords
trocar site hernia, laparoscopic surgery complications, Richter hernia, small bowel obstruction, hernia classification, fascial defect closure, cholecystectomy, colon and rectal surgery, fundoplication, gastric surgery, omental herniation
MeSH terms
Hernia, Humans, Laparoscopy, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Surgical Instruments, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review