Cited by 8Hernia repair and managementMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery

Umbilical port site hernia and diastasis recti

Open access
Ki, Hyun Jeong, Park, Jun Beom, Sul, Ji-Young·2020·The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

Abstract

Purpose: The port site hernia (PSH) is a specific type of incisional hernia related to the trocar sites of laparoscopic surgery. Diastasis recti of the abdominis muscle (DR) is the separation of the rectus muscle by a certain distance. The present study aims to present our experience with umbilical PSH and concomitant DR and to raise awareness of DR as one of the risk factors of umbilical PSH. Methods: Eighteen patients with umbilical PSH after laparoscopic abdominal surgery, was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative CT was analyzed to measure the Inter-recti distance (IRD) for all patients. Other factors, such as trocar size, wound infection, obesity (BMI), port extension, suture materials, and pre-existing co-morbidities, were recorded and analyzed. Results: Extension of the port incision was associated with umbilical PSH. Ten out of eighteen umbilical PSH patients (56%) had DR before they had first laparoscopic surgery. Nine (50%) patients showed sarcopenia. Moreover, four out of five recurrences had DR. More than two recurrences were all associated with DR. Conclusion: Port extension and sarcopenia were risk factors of umbilical PSH. Also, DR might be a possible risk factor of umbilical PSH occurrence and recurrence. Surgeons should be aware of the presence of DR before the planning of the laparoscopic surgery by diagnostic imaging. If DR is associated with umbilical PSH, we need to consider the correction of both pathologies at the same time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7602/jmis.2020.23.2.80

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ki, H. J., Park, J. B., & Sul, J.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
  • Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
Corresponding author
Sul, Ji-Young
Venue
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Published
2020-06-15
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
80-85
ISSN
  • 1738-7884 (ISSN-L)
  • 2234-778X
  • 2234-5248
OpenAlex
W3036855163
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Daehan nae'si'gyeong bog'gang'gyeong oe'gwa haghoeji/Journal of minimally invasive surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Keywords
diastasis recti abdominis, incisional hernia, laparoscopic surgery, sarcopenia, inter-recti distance, hernia recurrence, risk factors, rectus abdominis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review