Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognosis in Intra-abdominal Infections: Multivariate Analysis on 604 Patients

Pacelli, Fabio·1996·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that influence mortality in patients who are affected by intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) and to make a comparison among three different scoring systems: the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, the sepsis score of Elebute and Stoner, and the Mannheim peritonitis index. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Both primary and referral hospital care. PATIENTS: The hospital records of 604 patients who consecutively underwent emergency operations for unequivocal IAIs, both spontaneous and postoperative, from 1981 to 1993, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with IAIs that were related to peritoneal dialysis or infected ascites, those patients who were affected by primary peritonitis from a distant site, and those patients who underwent operations for acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis without peritoneal contamination were excluded from the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to calculate the prognostic significance of the following variables: age (< or = 70 vs > 70 years); sex; type (spontaneous vs postoperative) and extent (localized vs diffuse) of infection; preoperative serum levels of albumin, cholesterol, and hemoglobin; preoperative total lymphocyte count; amount of intraoperative blood loss; presence of preoperative organ impairment; the APACHE II score; the sepsis score of Elebute and Stoner; and the Mannheim peritonitis index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death was the outcome variable that was studied. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the APACHE II score, the Mannheim peritonitis index, hypoalbuminemia, hypocholesterolemia, and preoperative organ impairment were independent predictors of death. CONCLUSIONS: Results showed a significant dominance of host-related factors over the type and source of infection on the prognosis of patients with IAIs. Both the APACHE II score and the Mannheim peritonitis index correctly graded IAI severity and were strongly and independently associated with the outcome; however, the latter score has the advantage of being easier to calculate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Pacelli, F.
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
1996-06-01
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
641
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989603589
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis in Intra-abdominal Infections: Multivariate Analysis on 604 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014
The paper
Pacelli, F. (1996). Prognosis in Intra-abdominal Infections: Multivariate Analysis on 604 Patients. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.