Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis*

Montravers, Philippe, Dupont, Hervé, Gauzit, Remy, Veber, Benoit, Auboyer, Christian, Blin, Patrick, Hennequin, Christophe, Martin, Claude·2006·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of Candida cultured from peritoneal fluid specimens remains a matter of debate. None of the studies that have addressed this issue have clearly distinguished between community-acquired peritonitis and nosocomial peritonitis. The current study tried to differentiate the pathogenic role of Candida in these two clinical settings and assess its importance on outcome. DESIGN: A multiple-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted in intensive care unit patients. The interaction between mortality rates and type of patients was assessed. In the case of a significant interaction, a separate analysis of mortality and morbidity was planned. SETTING: Seventeen intensive care units in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Cases were patients operated on for peritonitis with Candida cultured from the peritoneal fluid, whereas controls were operated patients free from yeast. Cases and controls were matched for type of infection, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, age, and time period of hospitalization. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following characteristics were collected: demographic variables, underlying disease, severity score, site of infection, microbiological features, and anti-infective treatments. Survival was defined as the main outcome criterion and morbidity variables as secondary criteria. Odds ratios of mortality were calculated. Matching was achieved in 91 cases and 168 controls. Matching criteria, clinical characteristics, and mortality rate were not statistically different between cases and controls. A significant interaction was demonstrated between mortality rates and type of infection, leading to separate analysis of patients with community-acquired peritonitis and nosocomial peritonitis. The subgroup analysis demonstrated an increased mortality rate only in nosocomial peritonitis with fungal isolates (48% vs. 28% in controls, p<.01). Upper gastrointestinal tract site (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-14.8) and isolation of Candida species (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-6.7, p<.001) were found to be independent risk factors of mortality in nosocomial peritonitis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation of Candida species appears to be an independent risk factor of mortality in nosocomial peritonitis but not in community-acquired peritonitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000201889.39443.d2

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Montravers, P., Dupont, H., Gauzit, R., Veber, B., Auboyer, C., Blin, P., Hennequin, C., & Martin, C.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
646-652
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137305695
Cited by
285
References
22
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000201889.39443.d2
The paper
Montravers, P., Dupont, H., Gauzit, R., Veber, B., Auboyer, C., Blin, P., Hennequin, C., & Martin, C. (2006). Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000201889.39443.d2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.