Cited by 264Surgical Simulation and TrainingVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnatomy and Medical Technology

Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Surgical Training—A Randomized Control Trial

Open access
Pulijala, Yeshwanth, Ma, Minhua, Pears, Matthew, Peebles, David, Ayoub, Ashraf·2018·Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Purpose Surgical training methods are evolving with the technological advancements, including the application of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality. However, 28 to 40% of novice residents are not confident in performing a major surgical procedure. VR surgery, an immersive VR (iVR) experience, was developed using Oculus Rift and Leap Motion devices (Leap Motion, Inc, San Francisco, CA) to address this challenge. Our iVR is a multisensory, holistic surgical training application that demonstrates a maxillofacial surgical technique, the Le Fort I osteotomy. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of using VR surgery on the self-confidence and knowledge of surgical residents.Materials and methods A multisite, single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed. The participants were novice surgical residents with limited experience in performing the Le Fort I osteotomy. The primary outcome measures were the self-assessment scores of trainee confidence using a Likert scale and an objective assessment of the cognitive skills. Ninety-five residents from 7 dental schools were included in the RCT. The participants were randomly divided into a study group of 51 residents and a control group of 44. Participants in the study group used the VR surgery application on an Oculus Rift with Leap Motion device. The control group participants used similar content in a standard PowerPoint presentation on a laptop. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance was applied to the data to assess the overall effect of the intervention on the confidence of the residents.Results The study group participants showed significantly greater perceived self-confidence levels compared with those in the control group (P = .034; α = 0.05). Novices in the first year of their training showed the greatest improvement in their confidence compared with those in their second and third year.Conclusions iVR experiences improve the knowledge and self-confidence of the surgical residents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joms.2017.10.002

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muñoz et al., Dey et al., and Škola et al. utilised real-time bio-signals and created a layer of adaptiveness in IVR training.

    “Muñoz et al. [50], Dey et al. [83] and Škola et al. [55] grasp this offering, utilised real-time bio-signals and created a layer of adaptiveness in the IVR training.”

    From A systematic review of immersive virtual reality for industrial skills training (2021) · cites this paper as [83]

    The VR Surgery section describes an immersive surgical-training application using an Oculus Rift and Leap Motion controller, but does not address real-time bio-signals or adaptive training. Searches for those terms and for Muñoz, Dey, and Škola found no passage in our copy that verifies the attributed claim. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mitchell L: Safer Surgery. Routledge, 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pulijala, Y., Ma, M., Pears, M., Peebles, D., & Ayoub, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Pulijala, Yeshwanth
Venue
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
76
Issue
5
Pages
1065-1072
ISSN
0278-2391 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2764130726
Cited by
264
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (acceptedVersion)
  • Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
immersive virtual reality, surgical training, Le Fort I osteotomy, maxillofacial surgery, surgical residents, self-confidence, surgical knowledge, Oculus Rift, Leap Motion, dental education, simulation-based training
MeSH terms
Simulation Training, Virtual Reality, Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Self Concept, Surgery, Oral, Single-Blind Method, Osteotomy, Le Fort

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review