The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Epidemiologic Study of the Benefits and Risks of Running
Abstract
To better estimate rates of certain benefits and risks of recreational running, we sent questionnaires to 1,250 randomly selected male and 1,250 female registrants for a 10-km road race. The response rate was 55% for men and 58% for women. Telephone interviews of a randomly selected group of nonrespondents indicated that the only significant differences between respondents and nonrespondents were that (1) respondents were older than nonrespondents, (2) more male nonrespondents had stopped running during the year after the race, and (3) more male nonrespondents had been hit by thrown objects. One year after the race, 89% of male and 79% of female respondents were still running regularly. Eighty-one percent of men and 75% of women who smoked cigarettes when they began running had stopped smoking after beginning recreational running. Giving up smoking was significantly more common for current runners than for "retired" runners. Weight loss was commonly associated with running and was greater in those persons who were overweight when they began running. More than a third of respondents had a musculoskeletal injury attributed to running in the year after the race and about one seventh of all respondents sought medical consultation for their injury. The risk of injury increased with increasing weekly mileage. This study uses epidemiologic methods to quantify some of the benefits and risks of running.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AS AN INDEX OF HEART ATTACK RISK IN COLLEGE ALUMNI1
PAFFENBARGER, R. S., WING, A. L., & HYDE, R. T. (1978) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112608 · Cited by 1,980
Running as treatment for depression
Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., Eischens, R. R., Faris, J., Gurman, A. S., & Morgan, W. P. (1979) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0010-440x(79)90058-0 · Cited by 378
Death During Jogging or Running: A Study of 18 Cases
Thompson, P. D. (1979) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.242.12.1265 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Incidence, Severity, Aetiology and Prevention of Sports Injuries: A Review of Concepts
van Mechelen, W., Hlobil, H., & Kemper, H. C. G. (1992) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199214020-00002 · Cited by 2,015
Soligard, T., Schwellnus, M., Alonso, J.-M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 · Cited by 1,041
Schwellnus, M., Soligard, T., Alonso, J.-M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T. J., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096572 · Cited by 836
Physical Activity for Health: What Kind? How Much? How Intense? On Top of What?
Powell, K. E., Paluch, A. E., & Blair, S. N. (2011) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101151 · Cited by 685
Arch structure and injury patterns in runners
Williams III, D. S., McClay, I. S., & Hamill, J. (2001) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00005-5 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Koplan, J. P.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1982-12-17
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3118
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2051095812
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Epidemiologic Study of the Benefits and Risks of Running. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1982.03330230030026
- The paper
- Koplan, J. P. (1982). An Epidemiologic Study of the Benefits and Risks of Running. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03330230030026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.