Cited by 1,041Sports injuries and preventionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

How much is too much? (Part 1) international olympic committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury.

Open access
Soligard, Torbjørn, Schwellnus, Martin, Alonso, Juan-Manuel, Bahr, Roald, Clarsen, Ben, Dijkstra, H Paul, Gabbett, Tim, Gleeson, Michael +10 more·2016·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Athletes participating in elite sports are exposed to high training loads and increasingly saturated competition calendars. Emerging evidence indicates that poor load management is a major risk factor for injury. The International Olympic Committee convened an expert group to review the scientific evidence for the relationship of load (defined broadly to include rapid changes in training and competition load, competition calendar congestion, psychological load and travel) and health outcomes in sport. We summarise the results linking load to risk of injury in athletes, and provide athletes, coaches and support staff with practical guidelines to manage load in sport. This consensus statement includes guidelines for (1) prescription of training and competition load, as well as for (2) monitoring of training, competition and psychological load, athlete well-being and injury. In the process, we identified research priorities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581

Cites

212 of 212 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Hill J. Sport in history: an introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  2. Viru A, Viru M. Nature of training effects. In: Garrett WE Jr, Kirkendall DT, eds. Exercise and sport science. 1st edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000:67-96.
  3. Baker S, O'Neill B, Karpf R. The injury fact book. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  4. Schwellnus M, Soligard T, Alonso JM, et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness: how much is too much? Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-41.
  5. Oxford Dictionaries. 'Load'. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxforddictionaries. com/definition/english/load (accessed 24 May 2016).
  6. Soligard T, et al. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-1041. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 Consensus statement on July 17, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bjsm.bmj.com/ Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 on 17 August 2016. Downloaded from · DOI
  7. Soligard T, et al. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-1041. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 1039 Consensus statement on July 17, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bjsm.bmj.com/ Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 on 17 August 2016. Downloaded from 104 · DOI
  8. Rasmussen CH, Nielsen RO, Juul MS, et al. Weekly running volume and risk of running-related injuries among marathon runners. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:111-20. 156
  9. Asmussen E. Muscle fatigue. Med Sci Sports 1979;11:313-21. 163
  10. Soligard T, et al. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-1041. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 Consensus statement on July 17, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bjsm.bmj.com/ Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 on 17 August 2016. Downloaded from 170 · DOI
  11. Anderson L, Triplett-McBride T, Foster C, et al. Impact of training patterns on incidence of illness and injury during a women's collegiate basketball season. J Strength Cond Res 2003;17:734-8. 179
  12. Ivarsson A, Johnson U. Psychological factors as predictors of injuries among senior soccer players. A prospective study. J Sports Sci Med 2010;9:347-52. 206
  13. Soligard T, et al. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-1041. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 1041 Consensus statement on July 17, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://bjsm.bmj.com/ Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 on 17 August 2016. Downloaded from · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soligard, T., Schwellnus, M., Alonso, J.-M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., Gabbett, T., Gleeson, M., Hägglund, M., Hutchinson, M. R., Janse van Rensburg, C., Khan, K. M., Meeusen, R., Orchard, J. W., Pluim, B. M., Raftery, M., Budgett, R., & Engebretsen, L.
Affiliations
  • International Olympic Committee (CH)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital (QA)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Dutch Lawn Tennis Federation (NL)
  • World Rugby (IE)
Corresponding author
Soligard, Torbjørn
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
50
Issue
17
Pages
1030-1041
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W4211011355
Cited by
1,041
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 4
FWCI
89.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Olympic Committee
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
training load, injury risk, load management, psychological burden, training load prescription, load monitoring, athlete well-being, elite athletes, consensus recommendations
MeSH terms
Return to Sport, Athletic Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Education and Training, Professional Practice, Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Risk Factors, Sports Medicine, Stress, Psychological, Travel, Workload, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Early Diagnosis, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review