The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coronary Perfusion Pressure and the Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Human Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Abstract
Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), the aortic-to-right atrial pressure gradient during the relaxation phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, was measured in 100 patients with cardiac arrest. Coronary perfusion pressure and other variables were compared in patients with and without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Twenty-four patients had ROSC. Initial CPP (mean +/- SD) was 1.6 +/- 8.5 mm Hg in patients without ROSC and 13.4 +/- 8.5 mm Hg in those with ROSC. The maximal CPP measured was 8.4 +/- 10.0 mm Hg in those without ROSC and 25.6 +/- 7.7 mm Hg in those with ROSC. Differences were also found for the maximal aortic relaxation pressure, the compression-phase aortic-to-right atrial gradient, and the arterial PO2. No patient with an initial CPP less than 0 mm Hg had ROSC. Only patients with maximal CPPs of 15 mm Hg or more had ROSC, and the fraction of patients with ROSC increased as the maximal CPP increased. A CPP above 15 mm Hg did not guarantee ROSC, however, as 18 patients whose CPPs were 15 mm Hg or greater did not resuscitate. Of variables measured, maximal CPP was most predictive of ROSC, and all CPP measurements were more predictive than was aortic pressure alone. The study substantiates animal data that indicate the importance of CPP during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Wik, L. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.3.299 · Cited by 1,538
Soar, J., Berg, K. M., Andersen, L. W., Böttiger, B. W., Cacciola, S., Callaway, C. W., Couper, K., Cronberg, T., D’Arrigo, S., Deakin, C. D., et al. (2020) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.012 · Cited by 616
Yannopoulos, D., McKnite, S., Aufderheide, T. P., Sigurdsson, G., Pirrallo, R. G., Benditt, D., & Lurie, K. G. (2005) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.009 · Cited by 326
Pre-hospital extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Singer, B., Reynolds, J. C., Lockey, D. J., & O’Brien, B. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-018-0489-y · Cited by 58
Poppe, M., Schriefl, C., Steinacher, A., Clodi, C., Warenits, A.-M., Nürnberger, A., Hubner, P., Holzer, M., Horvat, J., Wiedemann, D., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000001142 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Paradis, N. A.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1990-02-23
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1106
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2054529326
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary Perfusion Pressure and the Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Human Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1990.03440080084029
- The paper
- Paradis, N. A. (1990). Coronary Perfusion Pressure and the Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Human Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440080084029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.