Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Severity of Childhood Asthma

Weitzman, Michael·1992·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the prevalence and distribution of childhood asthma and its relationship with various measures of children's health and functioning between 1981 and 1988. It was hypothesized that there would be an increase in the prevalence of asthma, especially among black children, and that available measures would suggest a deterioration in the health and functioning of children with asthma over this period. DESIGN: Analyses of data from the Child Health Supplements to the National Health Interview Survey. SETTING AND SAMPLE: Nationally representative random sample of 15,224 children aged 0 to 17 years in 1981 and 17,110 in 1988. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in (1) the prevalence and distribution of asthma, and (2) among children with asthma, the percentage of children hospitalized, days spent in bed, school days lost in the year prior to survey, and parent ratings and reports of children's overall health status and behavior problems. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of childhood asthma increased from 3.1% in 1981 to 4.3% in 1988 (P < .0001), with similar increases for children, adolescents, and both sexes. Increases occurred among white children (2.7% to 4.1%; P < .0001) but not black children (5.3% vs 5.1%; not significant). Among those with asthma in 1988 compared with 1981, there was better overall health status (11% vs 24% fair/poor; P < .0001) and fewer with 30 or more days spent in bed in the last year (3.9% vs 7.2%; P < .04). We also observed trends toward a lower rate of hospitalization in the last year (10% vs 14%; P = .07), fewer school days missed (2% vs 6% with > 30 days; P = .08), and a lower rate of extreme behavior problem scores (13% vs 18%; P = .09) in 1988 compared with 1981. Reductions were similar among both black and white children. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the estimated prevalence of asthma among children in the United States increased by almost 40%, and that although the increase occurred exclusively among white children, the prevalence of asthma still remains higher in black children than in white children. There was no support for increasing asthma severity and functional impact among either black or white children with asthma in 1988 compared with 1981. These findings provide no evidence to support the beliefs that asthma prevalence is increasing largely among black children or that the severity of asthma among most children in the United States is increasing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1992.03490190073034

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Weitzman, M.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1992-11-18
Volume
268
Issue
19
Pages
2673
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2081411578
Cited by
375
References
32
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Severity of Childhood Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1992.03490190073034
The paper
Weitzman, M. (1992). Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Severity of Childhood Asthma. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490190073034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.