The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Overdiagnosis of Lyme Disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the diagnoses, serological test results, and treatment results of the patients evaluated in a Lyme disease clinic, both prior to referral and from current evaluation. DESIGN: Retrospective case survey of prescreened patients. SETTING: Research and diagnostic Lyme disease clinic in a university hospital. PATIENTS: All 788 patients referred to the clinic during a 4.5-year period who were thought by the referring physician or the patient to have a diagnosis of Lyme disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Symptoms and signs of disease, immunodiagnostic tests of Lyme disease, and tests of neurological function. RESULTS: Of the 788 patients, 180 (23%) had active Lyme disease, usually arthritis, encephalopathy, or polyneuropathy. One hundred fifty-six patients (20%) had previous Lyme disease and another current illness, most commonly chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia; and in 49 patients, these symptoms began soon after objective manifestations of Lyme disease. The remaining 452 patients (57%) did not have Lyme disease. The majority of these patients also had the chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia; the others usually had rheumatic or neurological diseases. Of the patients who did not have Lyme disease, 45% had had positive serological test results for Lyme disease in other laboratories, but all were seronegative in our laboratory. Prior to referral, 409 of the 788 patients had been treated with antibiotic therapy. In 322 (79%) of these patients, the reason for lack of response was incorrect diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of the patients referred to the clinic met diagnostic criteria for Lyme disease. The most common reason for lack of response to antibiotic therapy was misdiagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wormser, G. P., Dattwyler, R. J., Shapiro, E. D., Halperin, J. J., Steere, A. C., Klempner, M. S., Krause, P. J., Bakken, J. S., Strle, F., Stanek, G., et al. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/508667 · Cited by 2,087
Self-citationSteere, A. C., Coburn, J., & Glickstein, L. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200421681 · Cited by 788
Self-citationIncidence of Clinician-Diagnosed Lyme Disease, United States, 2005–2010
Nelson, C. A., Saha, S., Kugeler, K. J., Delorey, M. J., Shankar, M. B., Hinckley, A. F., & Mead, P. S. (2015) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2109.150417 · Cited by 396
Lyme Disease Testing by Large Commercial Laboratories in the United States
Hinckley, A. F., Connally, N. P., Meek, J. I., Johnson, B. J., Kemperman, M. M., Feldman, K. A., White, J. L., & Mead, P. S. (2014) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciu397 · Cited by 386
Liang, F. T., Steere, A. C., Marques, A. R., Johnson, B. J. B., Miller, J. N., & Philipp, M. T. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.12.3990-3996.1999 · Cited by 279
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Steere, A. C.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-04-14
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1812
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1967333253
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Overdiagnosis of Lyme Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03500140064037
- The paper
- Steere, A. C. (1993). The Overdiagnosis of Lyme Disease. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500140064037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.