The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Very Low-Calorie Diets
Abstract
Objective. —To provide an overview of the published scientific information on the safety and efficacy of very low-calorie diets (VLCDs) and to provide rational recommendations for their use. Data Sources and Extraction. —Original reports obtained through a MEDLINE search for 1966 through 1992 on VLCDs or reducing diets plus obesity, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies and the opinions of experts in the field of nutrition and weight loss therapy for obesity. Only studies of humans were cited. Data Synthesis. —Current VLCDs are usually provided in the context of comprehensive treatment programs, during which usual food intake is completely replaced by specific foods or liquid formulas containing 3350 kJ/d (800 kcal/d) or less. Weight loss on VLCDs averages 1.5 to 2.5 kg/wk; total loss after 12 to 16 weeks averages 20 kg. These results are superior to standard low-calorie diets of 5020 kJ/d (1200 kcal/d), which lead to weight losses of 0.4 to 0.5 kg/wk and an average total loss of only 6 to 8 kg. There is little evidence that intakes of less than 3350 kJ/d (800 kcal/d) result in better weight losses than 3350 kJ. Intake of at least 1 g/kg of ideal body weight per day of protein of high biologic value appears to be important in helping to preserve lean body mass. Serious complications of modern VLCDs are unusual, cholelithiasis being most common. Conclusions. —Current VLCDs are generally safe when used under proper medical supervision in moderately and severely obes…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Increased risk of gallstone formation during and after VLCD-induced rapid weight loss is incorporated in clinical recommendations as an adverse event, advising physicians to inform patients about this risk, but the risk magnitude has been unclear.7, 16, 20”
In the citing paper
“However, the safety of commercial programs has rarely been studied”
In the citing paper
“using VLCD in commercial weight loss programs is a particular concern given the risk of adverse events as well as weight regain.7, 8, 9”
Citations
Cites
Stunkard, A. J. (1986) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03380010055024 · Cited by 912
Correlations between Antepartum Maternal Metabolism and Intelligence of Offspring
Rizzo, T., Metzger, B. E., Burns, W. J., & Burns, K. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199109263251303 · Cited by 707
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ogden, C. L., Yanovski, S. Z., Carroll, M. D., & Flegal, K. M. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.052 · Cited by 1,561
Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients
Christou, N. V., Sampalis, J. S., Liberman, M., Look, D., Auger, S., McLean, A. P. H., & MacLean, L. D. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19 · Cited by 1,288
Douketis, J. D., Macie, C., Thabane, L., & Williamson, D. F. (2005) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802982 · Cited by 665
Behavioral treatment of obesity
Butryn, M. L., Webb, V., & Wadden, T. A. (2011) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.006 · Cited by 636
Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies.
Heymsfield, S. B., van Mierlo, C. A. J., van der Knaap, H. C. M., Heo, M., & Frier, H. I. (2003) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802258 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, R. L.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-08-25
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 967
- ISSN
- 0098-7484
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review