Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body Weight and Mortality: A 27-Year Follow-up of Middle-aged Men

Lee, I-Min·1993·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the nature of the relation between body weight and all-cause mortality. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, following up men from 1962 or 1966 (1962/1966) through 1988. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Harvard University alumni with a mean age of 46.6 years in 1962/1966 and without self-reported, physician-diagnosed coronary heart disease, stroke, or cancer, who completed questionnaires on weight, height, cigarette smoking habit, and physical activity (n = 19,297). We calculated body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) using self-reported measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality (4370 deaths). RESULTS: In multivariate analysis adjusting for age, cigarette smoking habit, and physical activity, we found a J-shaped relation between body mass index and mortality. Relative risks of dying for men with a body mass index of less than 22.5, 22.5 to less than 23.5, 23.5 to less than 24.5, 24.5 to less than 26.0, and 26.0 or greater were 1.00 (referent), 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.20), 0.95 (0.87 to 1.05), 1.01 (0.91 to 1.10), and 1.18 (1.08 to 1.28), respectively (P for linear trend = .0008). Among current smokers, the relation between body mass index and mortality was U-shaped, with lowest risk of death at a body mass index of 23.5 to less than 24.5. During early follow-up (1962/1966 through 1974), we also observed a U-shaped curve, this time with lowest mortality risk at a body mass index of 24.5 to less than 26.0. To minimize confounding by cigarette smoking and bias from antecedent disease and early mortality, we conducted analysis only among never smokers and omitted the first 5 years of follow-up (510 deaths). The corresponding relative risks from this analysis, adjusted for age and physical activity, were 1.00, 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.67), 1.06 (0.80 to 1.42), 1.27 (0.96 to 1.68), and 1.67 (1.29 to 2.17), respectively (P for linear trend = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In these prospective data, body weight and mortality were directly related. After accounting for confounding by cigarette smoking and bias resulting from illness-related weight loss or inappropriate control for the biologic effects of obesity, we found no evidence of excess mortality among lean men. Indeed, lowest mortality was observed among men weighing, on average, 20% below the US average for men of comparable age and height.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1993.03510230061036

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Lee, I.-M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1993-12-15
Volume
270
Issue
23
Pages
2823
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2080582844
Cited by
426
References
2
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body Weight and Mortality: A 27-Year Follow-up of Middle-aged Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03510230061036
The paper
Lee, I.-M. (1993). Body Weight and Mortality: A 27-Year Follow-up of Middle-aged Men. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510230061036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.