The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxic Effects of Sustained- vs Immediate-Release Niacin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare escalating doses of immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (SR) niacin for effectiveness in reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides and increasing levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and for the occurrence of adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel comparison of IR and SR niacin administered sequentially at 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 3000 mg/d, each for 6 weeks. SETTING: Cholesterol research center. PATIENTS: Forty-six adults, 23 in each group, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) after 1 month of a step 1 National Cholesterol Education Program diet. OUTCOME MEASURES: Fourteen-hour fasting lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol levels, results of clinical laboratory tests, a symptom questionnaire, and withdrawal rates. RESULTS: The SR niacin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly more than IR niacin did at the dosage of 1500 mg/d and above, while IR niacin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly more than SR niacin did at all dosage levels. The reduction in triglyceride levels was similar with IR and SR niacin. Nine (39%) of the 23 patients assigned to the IR dosage form withdrew before completing the 3000-mg daily dose; the most common reasons for withdrawal were vasodilatory symptoms, fatigue, and acanthosis nigricans. Eighteen (78%) of the 23 patients assigned to the SR dosage form withdrew before completing the 3000-mg daily dose; the most common reasons for withdrawal were gastrointestinal tract symptoms, fatigue, and increases in levels of liver aminotransferases, often with symptoms of hepatic dysfunction. None of the patients taking IR niacin developed hepatotoxic effects, while 12 (52%) of the 23 patients taking SR niacin did. CONCLUSION: The SR form of niacin is hepatotoxic and should be restricted from use. The IR niacin is preferred for the management of hypercholesterolemia but can also cause significant adverse effects and should be given only to patients who can be carefully monitored by experienced health professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friedewald, W. T., Levy, R. I., & Fredrickson, D. S. (1972) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499 · Cited by 32,423
Grundy, S. M., Bilheimer, D. W., Chait, A., Clark, L. T., Denke, M. A., Havel, R. J., Hazzard, W. R., Hulley, S. B., Hunninghake, D. B., Kreisberg, R. A., et al. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.269.23.3015 · Cited by 27,947
Self-citationMultivariate Statistical Methods
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Public Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_2263 · Cited by 5,580
Brown, G., Albers, J. J., Fisher, L. D., Schaefer, S. M., Lin, J.-T., Kaplan, C., Zhao, X.-Q., Bisson, B. D., Fitzpatrick, V. F., & Dodge, H. T. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199011083231901 · Cited by 2,159
Fifteen year mortality in Coronary Drug Project patients: long-term benefit with niacin
Canner, P. L., Berge, K. G., Wenger, N. K., Stamler, J., Friedman, L., Prineas, R. J., & Friedewald, W. (1986) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80293-5 · Cited by 1,824
Clofibrate and Niacin in Coronary Heart Disease
(1975) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1975.03240160024021 · Cited by 1,747
Blankenhorn, D. H. (1987) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03390230069027 · Cited by 1,655
Unbalanced Repeated-Measures Models with Structured Covariance Matrices
Jennrich, R. I., & Schluchter, M. D. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530695 · Cited by 1,325
Kane, J. P. (1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450230043027 · Cited by 829
CARLSON, L. A., HAMSTEN, A., & ASPLUND, A. (1989) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.1989.tb01393.x · Cited by 443
Cited by
Cornier, M.-A., Dabelea, D., Hernandez, T. L., Lindstrom, R. C., Steig, A. J., Stob, N. R., Van Pelt, R. E., Wang, H., & Eckel, R. H. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0024 · Cited by 2,162
Stepan, A. F., Walker, D. P., Bauman, J., Price, D. A., Baillie, T. A., Kalgutkar, A. S., & Aleo, M. D. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200168d · Cited by 698
Dubé, M. P., Stein, J. H., Aberg, J. A., Fichtenbaum, C. J., Gerber, J. G., Tashima, K. T., Henry, W. K., Currier, J. S., Sprecher, D., Glesby, M. J., et al. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/378131 · Cited by 580
Grundy, S. M. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.14.1568 · Cited by 551
HDL-targeted therapies: progress, failures and future
Kingwell, B. A., Chapman, M. J., Kontush, A., & Miller, N. E. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4279 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- McKenney, J. M.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-03-02
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 672
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1988179941
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxic Effects of Sustained- vs Immediate-Release Niacin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1994.03510330050033
- The paper
- McKenney, J. M. (1994). A Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxic Effects of Sustained- vs Immediate-Release Niacin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510330050033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.