The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Efficacy of Influenza Vaccination in Elderly Individuals: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly people. DESIGN: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Fifteen family practices in the Netherlands during influenza season 1991-1992. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1838 subjects aged 60 years or older, not known as belonging to those high-risk groups in which vaccination was previously given. INTERVENTION: Purified split-virion vaccine containing A/Singapore/6/86(H1N1), A/Beijing/353/89(H3N2), B/Beijing/1/87, and B/Panama/45/90 (n = 927) or intramuscular placebo containing physiological saline solution (n = 911). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients presenting with influenzalike illness up to 5 months after vaccination; self-reported influenza in postal questionnaires 10 weeks and 5 months after vaccination; serological influenza (fourfold increase of antibody titer between 3 weeks and 5 months after vaccination). RESULTS: The incidence of serological influenza was 4% in the vaccine group and 9% in the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.61). The incidences of clinical influenza were 2% and 3%, respectively (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.73). The effect was strongest for the combination of serological and clinical influenza (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.74). The effect was less pronounced for self-reported influenza. CONCLUSION: In the elderly, influenza vaccination may halve the incidence of serological and clinical influenza (in periods of antigenic drift).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Osterholm, M. T., Kelley, N. S., Sommer, A., & Belongia, E. A. (2012) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70295-x · Cited by 1,789
Grohskopf, L. A., Sokolow, L. Z., Broder, K. R., Walter, E. B., Fry, A. M., & Jernigan, D. B. (2018) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6703a1 · Cited by 1,632
Antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly: A quantitative review
GOODWIN, K., VIBOUD, C., & SIMONSEN, L. (2006) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.105 · Cited by 1,064
Efficacy of High-Dose versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults
DiazGranados, C. A., Dunning, A. J., Kimmel, M., Kirby, D., Treanor, J., Collins, A., Pollak, R., Christoff, J., Earl, J., Landolfi, V., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1315727 · Cited by 876
Chronic stress alters the immune response to influenza virus vaccine in older adults.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Glaser, R., Gravenstein, S., Malarkey, W. B., & Sheridan, J. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.7.3043 · Cited by 789
Metadata
- Authors
- Govaert, T. M. E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-12-07
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1661
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2060873578
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Efficacy of Influenza Vaccination in Elderly Individuals: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1994.03520210045030
- The paper
- Govaert, T. M. E. (1994). The Efficacy of Influenza Vaccination in Elderly Individuals: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520210045030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.