The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ovarian Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up
Abstract
Objective. —To provide physicians with a current consensus on screening, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian cancer. Participants. —A nonfederal, nonadvocate, 14-member consensus panel representing the fields of gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncology, obstetrics/ gynecology, and biostatistics; 25 experts in obstetrics/gynecology and gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncology who presented data to the consensus panel; and a conference audience of approximately 500. Evidence. —The literature was searched through MEDLINE, and an extensive bibliography of references was produced for the panel and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given priority over clinical anecdotal experience. Consensus. —The panel, answering predefined consensus questions, developed their conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. Consensus Statement. —The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. The panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. Conclusions. —There is no evidence available yet that the current screening modalities of CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasonography can be effectively used for widespread screening to reduce mortality from ovarian cancer nor that their use will result in decreased rather than increased morbidity and mortality. Women with stage IA grade 1 and stage IB grade 1 ovarian cancer do not require postoperative adjuvant therapy. Many remaining stage I patients do require chemotherapy. Subsets of stage I must be fully defined and ideal treatment determined. Women with stages II, III, and IV epithelial ovarian cancer (other than low malignant potential tumors) should receive postoperative chemotherapy. (JAMA. 1995;273:491-497)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Burke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
Uses and abuses of screening tests
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07948-5 · Cited by 545
Tempany, C. M. C., Zou, K. H., Silverman, S. G., Brown, D. L., Kurtz, A. B., & McNeil, B. J. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn25761 · Cited by 381
Finch, A., Shaw, P., Rosen, B., Murphy, J., Narod, S. A., & Colgan, T. J. (2006) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.065 · Cited by 375
Nelson, H. D., Huffman, L. H., Fu, R., & Harris, E. L. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-5-200509060-00012 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Seltzer, V.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-02-08
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 491
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2110355445
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ovarian Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03520300065039
- The paper
- Seltzer, V. (1995). Ovarian Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520300065039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.