The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment and Counseling for Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Guide for Clinicians
Abstract
More women in all risk categories are seeking information regarding their individual breast cancer risk, and there is a need for their primary care clinicians to be able to assess familial risk factors for breast cancer, provide individualized risk information, and offer surveillance recommendations. Estimates of the number of women with a family history of breast cancer range from approximately 5% to 20%, depending on the population surveyed. Many of these women will not have a family history that suggests the presence of a highly penetrant breast cancer susceptibility gene. However, a small subset of such women will come from families with a striking incidence of breast and other cancers often associated with inherited mutations. The development and refinement of risk prediction models provide an epidemiologic basis for counseling women with a family history that does not appear related to a dominant susceptibility gene. contrast, the recent isolation of BRCA1, the localization of BRCA2, and the acknowledgement that additional breast cancer susceptibility genes must exist provide a molecular basis for counseling some high-risk women. We present a guide for primary care clinicians that may be helpful in defining families as moderate or high risk, in determining individual risk in women with a family history of breast cancer based on this distinction, and for counseling women in a setting where the data necessary to design surveillance and prevention strategies are lacking. We include criteria for selecting women who may be candidates for detection of inherited mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C., & Mulvihill, J. J. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 · Cited by 3,334
Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers
FORD, D. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91578-4 · Cited by 1,850
Cited by
Burke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
Smith, R. A., Saslow, D., Andrews Sawyer, K., Burke, W., Costanza, M. E., Evans, W. P., Foster, R. S., Hendrick, E., Eyre, H. J., & Sener, S. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141 · Cited by 770
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Orel, S. G., & Schnall, M. D. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113 · Cited by 759
Kuhl, C. K., Schmutzler, R. K., Leutner, C. C., Kempe, A., Wardelmann, E., Hocke, A., Maringa, M., Pfeifer, U., Krebs, D., & Schild, H. H. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap01267 · Cited by 538
Sardanelli, F., Podo, F., D'Agnolo, G., Verdecchia, A., Santaquilani, M., Musumeci, R., Trecate, G., Manoukian, S., Morassut, S., de Giacomi, C., et al. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2423051965 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoskins, K. F.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-02-15
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 577
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2063507494
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment and Counseling for Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Guide for Clinicians. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03520310075033
- The paper
- Hoskins, K. F. (1995). Assessment and Counseling for Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Guide for Clinicians. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520310075033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.