Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Four-State Pilot Study From the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project

Ellerbeck, Edward F.·1995·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test indicators of the quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: All acute care hospitals in Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa, and Wisconsin. PATIENTS: All hospitalizations for Medicare patients discharged with a principal diagnosis of AMI between June 1, 1992, and February 28, 1993, were identified (N = 16,869). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of patients receiving appropriate interventions as defined by 11 quality-of-care indicators derived from clinical practice guidelines that were modified and updated in consultation with a national group of physicians and other health care professionals. RESULTS: We abstracted data from 16,124 (96%) of the hospitalizations, representing 14,108 primary hospitalizations and 2016 hospitalizations resulting from transfers. Potential exclusions to the use of standard treatments in AMI care were common with 90% and 70% of patients having potential exclusions for thrombolytics and beta-blockers, respectively. In cohorts of "ideal candidates" for specific interventions, 83% received aspirin, 69% received thrombolytics, and 70% received heparin during the initial hospitalization; 77% received aspirin and 45% received beta-blockers at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that many Medicare patients may not be ideal candidates for standard AMI therapies, but these treatments are underused, even in the absence of discernible contraindications. Hospitals and physicians who apply these quality indicators to their practices are likely to find opportunities for improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1995.03520430045037

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Ellerbeck, E. F.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1995-05-17
Volume
273
Issue
19
Pages
1509
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1971538582
Cited by
374
References
2
FWCI
21.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Four-State Pilot Study From the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03520430045037
The paper
Ellerbeck, E. F. (1995). Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Four-State Pilot Study From the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520430045037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.