Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Promotion of Women Physicians in Academic Medicine

Bland, Carole J.·1995·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

To the Editor. —In the article on gender differences in promotion, Dr Tesch and colleagues1state that there was no evidence that women had less academic preparation. We wonder if the assessment of academic preparation was too superficial to detect differences in preparation. For example, a study of graduates of family medicine fellowships found six variables that discriminated between graduates who published and those who did not. The six predictive variables were, in rank order, program affiliation (institution), training emphasis in fellowship on how data should be analyzed, time spent in research, encouragement to attend regional and national meetings (networking), current position (tenured vs nontenured), influence over own activities, and organization.2In the study by Tesch et al, given that sufficient detail to detect differences in preparation may not have been gathered, perhaps the true measure of the effectiveness of fellowship training and socialization were the significant differences

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1995.03530140045025

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Bland, C. J.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1995-10-11
Volume
274
Issue
14
Pages
1133
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4230107984
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promotion of Women Physicians in Academic Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03530140045025
The paper
Bland, C. J. (1995). Promotion of Women Physicians in Academic Medicine. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530140045025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.