The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is There Still a Glass Ceiling for Women in Academic Surgery?
Abstract
In Brief Despite the dramatically increased entry of women into general surgery and surgical subspecialties, traditionally male-dominated fields, there remains a gross under-representation of women in the leadership positions of these departments. Women begin their careers with fewer academic resources and tend to progress through the ranks slower than men. Female surgeons also receive significantly lower salaries than their male counterparts and are more vulnerable to discrimination, both obvious and covert. Although some argue that female surgeons tend to choose their families over careers, studies have actually shown that women are as eager as men to assume leadership positions, are equally qualified for these positions as men, and are as good as men at leadership tasks. Three major constraints contribute to the glass-ceiling phenomenon: traditional gender roles, manifestations of sexism in the medical environment, and lack of effective mentors. Gender roles contribute to unconscious assumptions that have little to do with actual knowledge and abilities of an individuals and they negatively influence decision-making when it comes to promotions. Sexism has many forms, from subtle to explicit forms, and some studies show that far more women report being discriminately against than do men. There is a lack of same-sex mentors and role models for women in academic surgery, thereby isolating female academicians further. This review summarizes the manifestation of the glass-ceiling phenomenon, identifies some causes of these inequalities, and proposes different strategies for continuing the advancement of women in academic surgery and to shatter the glass ceiling. Despite the dramatically increased entry of women into general surgery, a traditionally male-dominated field, there remains a gross underrepresentation of women in leadership positions. This review summarizes the manifestations and causes of this glass-ceiling phenomenon and proposes different strategies to continue the advancement of women in academic surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 · Cited by 2,547
Why So Slow?: The Advancement of Women
Valian, V. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7235.001.0001 · Cited by 1,252
The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective
Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Hylek, E. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053910 · Cited by 870
Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty
TRIX, F., & PSENKA, C. (2003) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926503014002277 · Cited by 553
Women Physicians in Academic Medicine — New Insights from Cohort Studies
Nonnemaker, L. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002103420606 · Cited by 490
Carr, P. L., Ash, A. S., Friedman, R. H., Scaramucci, A., Barnett, R. C., Szalacha, L. E., Palepu, A., & Moskowitz, M. A. (1998) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-7-199810010-00004 · Cited by 449
Bickel, J., Wara, D., Atkinson, B. F., Cohen, L. S., Dunn, M., Hostler, S., Johnson, T. R. B., Morahan, P., Rubenstein, A. H., Sheldon, G. F., et al. (2002) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200210000-00023 · Cited by 357
Faculty Perceptions of Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment in Academic Medicine
Carr, P. L., Ash, A. S., Friedman, R. H., Szalacha, L., Barnett, R. C., Palepu, A., & Moskowitz, M. M. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00007 · Cited by 355
Cited by
Prevalence and Causes of Attrition Among Surgical Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Khoushhal, Z., Hussain, M. A., Greco, E., Mamdani, M., Verma, S., Rotstein, O., Tricco, A. C., & Al-Omran, M. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4086 · Cited by 281
Dahlke, A. R., Johnson, J. K., Greenberg, C. C., Love, R., Kreutzer, L., Hewitt, D. B., Quinn, C. M., Engelhardt, K. E., & Bilimoria, K. Y. (2018) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002700 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuge, Y., Kaufman, J., Simeone, D. M., Chen, H., & Velazquez, O. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 253
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 637-643
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326912379
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is There Still a Glass Ceiling for Women in Academic Surgery? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111120
- The paper
- Zhuge, Y., Kaufman, J., Simeone, D. M., Chen, H., & Velazquez, O. C. (2011). Is There Still a Glass Ceiling for Women in Academic Surgery? Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.