The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhaled Steroids and the Risk of Hospitalization for Asthma
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma reduces the risk of asthma hospitalization. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A health maintenance organization (HMO) in eastern Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the HMO who were identified during the period October 1991 through September 1994 as having a diagnosis of asthma using a computerized medical record system. MAIN OUTCOME: Hospitalization for asthma. RESULTS: Of the 16941 eligible persons, 742 (4.4%) were hospitalized for asthma. The overall relative risk (RR) of hospitalization among those who received inhaled steroids was 0.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.6) after adjustment for beta-agonist dispensing. Additional adjustment for age, race, other asthma medications, and amount and type of ambulatory care for asthma did not substantially affect the inverse relationship between use of inhaled steroids and hospitalization. Cromolyn was similarly associated with reduced risk, especially among children (RR,0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9). In contrast, increasing beta-agonist use was associated with increasing hospitalization risk even after adjustment for other factors and medications. The steroid-associated protection was most marked among individuals who received the largest amount of beta-agonist. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled steroids and, to a lesser extent, cromolyn confer significant protection against exacerbations of asthma leading to hospitalization. These results support the use of inhaled steroids by individuals who require more than occasional beta-agonist use to control asthma symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Immortal Time Bias in Pharmacoepidemiology
Suissa, S. (2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwm324 · Cited by 1,708
Zhou, Z., Rahme, E., Abrahamowicz, M., & Pilote, L. (2005) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwi307 · Cited by 425
Effectiveness of pharmacist intervention for asthma control improvement
Mehuys, E., Van Bortel, L., De Bolle, L., Van Tongelen, I., Annemans, L., Remon, J. P., & Brusselle, G. (2008) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00112007 · Cited by 218
Self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, and patients' expectations predict outcomes in asthma
Mancuso, C. A., Rincon, M., McCulloch, C. E., & Charlson, M. E. (2001) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200112000-00008 · Cited by 158
Bias in observational study of the effectiveness of nasal corticosteroids in asthma
Suissa, S., & Ernst, P. (2005) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1118 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Donahue, J. G.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-03-19
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 887
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2006499560
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhaled Steroids and the Risk of Hospitalization for Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03540350037030
- The paper
- Donahue, J. G. (1997). Inhaled Steroids and the Risk of Hospitalization for Asthma. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540350037030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.