Cited by 39Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyAsthma and respiratory diseasesAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Bias in observational study of the effectiveness of nasal corticosteroids in asthma

Open access
Suissa, Samy, Ernst, Pierre·2005·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background A recent observational study suggests that intranasal corticosteroids used to treat allergic rhinitis are effective at preventing asthma outcomes, such as emergency visits. The approach to data analysis may have led to biased results because of misclassification of immortal time.Objective To illustrate the bias in the cohort approach and to present the proper time-dependent analysis by replicating the recent study using data from another source.Methods From an existing cohort of 30,569 patients with asthma age 5 to 44 years and identified from the Saskatchewan Health databases (1975-1997), we formed the cohort of all subjects who were in the source population between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1991. Subjects were followed to the first asthma hospitalization. All prescriptions dispensed during follow-up were identified. We replicated the time-fixed approach to data analysis used in the recent study and compared it with time-dependent approaches.Results The cohort included 20,173 subjects, of whom 1849 were hospitalized for asthma between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1991. The time-fixed approach misclassified more than 5000 person-years of follow-up, corresponding to 44% of the exposed person-time. As a result, the rate ratio of asthma hospitalization after any use of nasal corticosteroids (NCSs) was 0.57 by the biased time-fixed approach compared with 1.13 by the proper time-dependent approach. The time-fixed approach produced a paradoxical protective effect of NCS with 1 or less canisters dispensed per year (odds ratio, 0.47), which was further exaggerated when the cohort was extended to 5 years (odds ratio, 0.33). Adjusted time-dependent analyses found no protective effect, even when NCSs were dispensed regularly (rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.54-2.21).Conclusion The time-fixed approach to the analysis of the effectiveness of NCSs on asthma outcomes leads, by its inherent misclassification of immortal time, to a considerable exaggeration of the protective effect of these medications in preventing severe asthma exacerbations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1118

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The studies reviewed in this section were limited to prospective randomized trials to minimize biases and weaknesses of retrospective studies.

    “The studies reviewed in this section are limited to prospective randomized trials to minimize inherent biases and weaknesses of retrospective studies.1794”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suissa, S., & Ernst, P.
Affiliations
McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Suissa, Samy
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
714-719
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019885409
Cited by
39
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
intranasal corticosteroids, asthma, immortal time bias, time-dependent analysis, asthma hospitalization, allergic rhinitis, bias in observational studies, asthma exacerbations
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Hospitalization, Humans, Research Design, Rhinitis, Statistics as Topic, Time, Bias, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review