Cited by 218Pharmacy and Medical PracticesAsthma and respiratory diseasesMedication Adherence and Compliance

Effectiveness of pharmacist intervention for asthma control improvement

Open access
Mehuys, E., Van Bortel, L., De Bolle, L., Van Tongelen, I., Annemans, L., Remon, J. P., Brusselle, G.·2008·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Education on optimal medication use is an essential strategy to improve asthma control. The current authors investigated whether pharmacist interventions, focused on appropriate use of asthma medication and tailor-made to the patient's current asthma control, would improve asthma control in adult patients. A 6-month randomised, controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted in 66 community pharmacies in Belgium. Patients were randomly assigned to receive usual pharmacist care (n = 94) or a pre-defined pharmacist intervention (n = 107). This intervention mainly focused on improving inhalation technique and medication adherence. Primary outcome was the level of asthma control, as assessed by the Asthma Control Test® (ACT). Mean ACT scores did not change from baseline for both study groups. However, a pre-defined subgroup analysis of patients having insufficiently controlled asthma at baseline showed that the intervention had significantly increased the ACT score after 6 months compared with usual care. The intervention also reduced, for the complete study group, reliever medication use and the frequency of night-time awakenings due to asthma. Inhalation technique and adherence to controller medication were significantly better in the intervention group. In conclusion, pragmatic community pharmacy-based programmes can significantly improve therapeutic outcomes in adult asthma patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00112007

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehuys, E., Van Bortel, L., De Bolle, L., Van Tongelen, I., Annemans, L., Remon, J. P., & Brusselle, G.
Affiliations
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Mehuys, E.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2007-12-19
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
790-799
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2159371369
Cited by
218
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
  • Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
asthma control, pharmacist intervention, community pharmacy, inhaler technique, medication adherence, controller medications, rescue medication, Asthma Control Test, adult asthma patients, patient education
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adult, Asthma, Community Pharmacy Services, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Pharmacists, Self Administration, Severity of Illness Index, Anti-Asthmatic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review