Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 795

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer Survivors and Unemployment: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression

de Boer, Angela G. E. M., Taskila, Taina, Ojajärvi, Anneli, van Dijk, Frank J. H., Verbeek, Jos H. A. M.·2009·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Nearly half of adult cancer survivors are younger than 65 years, but the association of cancer survivorship with employment status is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of cancer survivorship with unemployment compared with healthy controls. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of studies published between 1966 and June 2008 was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and OSH-ROM databases. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included adult cancer survivors and a control group, and employment as an outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Pooled relative risks were calculated over all studies and according to cancer type. A Bayesian meta-regression analysis was performed to assess associations of unemployment with cancer type, country of origin, average age at diagnosis, and background unemployment rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles describing 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analyses included 20,366 cancer survivors and 157,603 healthy control participants. Studies included 16 from the United States, 15 from Europe, and 5 from other countries. Overall, cancer survivors were more likely to be unemployed than healthy control participants (33.8% vs 15.2%; pooled relative risk [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.55). Unemployment was higher in breast cancer survivors compared with control participants (35.6% vs 31.7%; pooled RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.49), as well as in survivors of gastrointestinal cancers (48.8% vs 33.4%; pooled RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.02-2.05), and cancers of the female reproductive organs (49.1% vs 38.3%; pooled RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Unemployment rates were not higher for survivors of blood cancers compared with controls (30.6% vs 23.7%; pooled RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.95-2.09), prostate cancers (39.4% vs 27.1%; pooled RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25), or testicular cancer (18.5% vs 18.1%; pooled RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.20). For survivors in the United States, the unemployment risk was 1.5 times higher compared with survivors in Europe (meta-RR, 1.48; 95% credibility interval, 1.15-1.95). After adjustment for diagnosis, age, and background unemployment rate, this risk disappeared (meta-RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.83). CONCLUSION: Cancer survivorship is associated with unemployment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.187

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 795

Metadata

Authors
de Boer, A. G. E. M., Taskila, T., Ojajärvi, A., van Dijk, F. J. H., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-02-18
Volume
301
Issue
7
Pages
753
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2072533493
Cited by
795
References
5
FWCI
19.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Survivors and Unemployment: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.187
The paper
de Boer, A. G. E. M., Taskila, T., Ojajärvi, A., van Dijk, F. J. H., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M. (2009). Cancer Survivors and Unemployment: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.187

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.