The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer Survivors and Unemployment: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression
Abstract
CONTEXT: Nearly half of adult cancer survivors are younger than 65 years, but the association of cancer survivorship with employment status is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of cancer survivorship with unemployment compared with healthy controls. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of studies published between 1966 and June 2008 was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and OSH-ROM databases. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included adult cancer survivors and a control group, and employment as an outcome. DATA EXTRACTION: Pooled relative risks were calculated over all studies and according to cancer type. A Bayesian meta-regression analysis was performed to assess associations of unemployment with cancer type, country of origin, average age at diagnosis, and background unemployment rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles describing 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analyses included 20,366 cancer survivors and 157,603 healthy control participants. Studies included 16 from the United States, 15 from Europe, and 5 from other countries. Overall, cancer survivors were more likely to be unemployed than healthy control participants (33.8% vs 15.2%; pooled relative risk [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.55). Unemployment was higher in breast cancer survivors compared with control participants (35.6% vs 31.7%; pooled RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.49), as well as in survivors of gastrointestinal cancers (48.8% vs 33.4%; pooled RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.02-2.05), and cancers of the female reproductive organs (49.1% vs 38.3%; pooled RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Unemployment rates were not higher for survivors of blood cancers compared with controls (30.6% vs 23.7%; pooled RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.95-2.09), prostate cancers (39.4% vs 27.1%; pooled RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25), or testicular cancer (18.5% vs 18.1%; pooled RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.74-1.20). For survivors in the United States, the unemployment risk was 1.5 times higher compared with survivors in Europe (meta-RR, 1.48; 95% credibility interval, 1.15-1.95). After adjustment for diagnosis, age, and background unemployment rate, this risk disappeared (meta-RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.83). CONCLUSION: Cancer survivorship is associated with unemployment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis
Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2001) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.6.3.203 · Cited by 716 · cited 7×
“Wettergren et al,39 2003 (Sweden) [Hodgkin disease] 90 (45) 47 (12) 14 (6-26) Age and residency Registry-based cross-sectional survey (for both groups)”
BackgroundInfluentialAndrykowski, M. A., Bishop, M. M., Hahn, E. A., Cella, D. F., Beaumont, J. L., Brady, M. J., Horowitz, M. M., Sobocinski, K. A., Rizzo, J. D., & Wingard, J. R. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.189 · Cited by 320 · cited 4×
“Sabatino et al,29 2006 (United States) Mixed 1710 (69) 47 (18-64) 5c None National registry-based crosssectional survey (for both groups)”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Ramsey, S., Blough, D., Kirchhoff, A., Kreizenbeck, K., Fedorenko, C., Snell, K., Newcomb, P., Hollingworth, W., & Overstreet, K. (2013) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1263 · Cited by 699
Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels
Davies, C. A., Spence, J. C., Vandelanotte, C., Caperchione, C. M., & Mummery, W. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-52 · Cited by 488
The Challenges of Colorectal Cancer Survivorship
Denlinger, C. S., & Barsevick, A. M. (2009) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2009.0058 · Cited by 324
Employment challenges for cancer survivors
Mehnert, A., de Boer, A., & Feuerstein, M. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28067 · Cited by 304
Self-citationEmotional Problems, Quality of Life, and Symptom Burden in Patients With Lung Cancer
Morrison, E. J., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Yang, P., Patten, C. A., Ruddy, K. J., & Clark, M. M. (2017) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2017.02.008 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer, A. G. E. M., Taskila, T., Ojajärvi, A., van Dijk, F. J. H., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-02-18
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 753
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2072533493
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Survivors and Unemployment: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.187
- The paper
- de Boer, A. G. E. M., Taskila, T., Ojajärvi, A., van Dijk, F. J. H., & Verbeek, J. H. A. M. (2009). Cancer Survivors and Unemployment: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.