Cited by 699Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealthcare Policy and ManagementCorporate Insolvency and Governance

Washington State Cancer Patients Found To Be At Greater Risk For Bankruptcy Than People Without A Cancer Diagnosis

Open access
Ramsey, Scott, Blough, David, Kirchhoff, Anne, Kreizenbeck, Karma, Fedorenko, Catherine, Snell, Kyle, Newcomb, Polly, Hollingworth, William +1 more·2013·Health Affairs

Abstract

Much has been written about the relationship between high medical expenses and the likelihood of filing for bankruptcy, but the relationship between receiving a cancer diagnosis and filing for bankruptcy is less well understood. We estimated the incidence and relative risk of bankruptcy for people age twenty-one or older diagnosed with cancer compared to people the same age without cancer by conducting a retrospective cohort analysis that used a variety of medical, personal, legal, and bankruptcy sources covering the Western District of Washington State in US Bankruptcy Court for the period 1995-2009. We found that cancer patients were 2.65 times more likely to go bankrupt than people without cancer. Younger cancer patients had 2-5 times higher rates of bankruptcy than cancer patients age sixty-five or older, which indicates that Medicare and Social Security may mitigate bankruptcy risk for the older group. The findings suggest that employers and governments may have a policy role to play in creating programs and incentives that could help people cover expenses in the first year following a cancer diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1263

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through trajectory risk, survivors experience loss of productive functions, financial crises, family tensions and stigma.

    “Through trajectory risk, survivors experience a loss of productive functions, financial crises, family tensions and stigma [42-44].”

    From Empowerment in the treatment of fatigue in breast cancer patients (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page not provided) describes lost income, inability to work, and long-term barriers to working for cancer survivors. The Discussion reports a higher bankruptcy rate among cancer patients. The paper does not address family tensions or stigma, so it supports only the work-related and financial parts of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]Kovac SD Judgment-proof debtors in bankruptcy American Bankruptcy Law Journal 1991 65 675 76
  2. [22]White MJ Bankruptcy reform and credit cards [Internet] Cambridge (MA) National Bureau of Economic Research 2007 7 [cited 2013 Apr 26]. (Working Paper 13265). Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13265.pdf
  3. [23]Landry AY Landry RJ Medical bankruptcy reform: a fallacy of composition American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review 2011 19 151 83

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsey, S., Blough, D., Kirchhoff, A., Kreizenbeck, K., Fedorenko, C., Snell, K., Newcomb, P., Hollingworth, W., & Overstreet, K.
Affiliations
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • David Blough is a principal statistician at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, in Niskayuna, New York.
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Karma Kreizenbeck is project director for the Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research.
  • Kyle Snell is a software engineer at Crowdtap, in New York City.
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Karen Overstreet is a United States Bankruptcy Judge in the Western District of Washington in Seattle.
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2013-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1143-1152
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2071663583
Cited by
699
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 10
FWCI
117.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (RC1MD004135)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Keywords
cancer, bankruptcy, medical debt, financial risk, cancer diagnosis, Medicare, social security, age differences, health policy, health care costs
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Health Expenditures, Female, Financing, Personal, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Social Class, Unemployment, Washington, Proportional Hazards Models, Bankruptcy, Age Distribution, SEER Program, Sick Leave, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review