Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intramyocardial Bone Marrow Cell Injection for Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

van Ramshorst, Jan, Bax, Jeroen J., Beeres, Saskia L. M. A., Dibbets-Schneider, Petra, Roes, Stijntje D., Stokkel, Marcel P. M., de Roos, Albert, Fibbe, Willem E., Zwaginga, Jaap J., Boersma, Eric, Schalij, Martin J., Atsma, Douwe E.·2009·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Previous studies have suggested that bone marrow cell injection may improve myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection on myocardial perfusion and LV function in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a Netherlands university hospital, May 1, 2005-March 3, 2008 (6-month follow-up ended September 2008) of 50 patients with chronic myocardial ischemia (mean age [SD], 64 [8] years; 43 men). INCLUSION CRITERIA: severe angina pectoris despite optimal medical therapy and myocardial ischemia. All patients were ineligible for conventional revascularization. INTERVENTIONS: Intramyocardial injection of 100 x 10(6) autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells or placebo solution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primarily, the summed stress score, a 17-segment score for stress myocardial perfusion assessed by Tc-99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Secondary included LV ejection fraction (LVEF), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class, and Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality-of-life score (mean difference >5% considered clinically significant). RESULTS: After 3-month follow-up, the summed stress score (mean [SD]) improved from 23.5 (4.7) to 20.1 (4.6) (P < .001) in the bone marrow cell group, compared with a decrease from 24.8 (5.5) to 23.7 (5.4) (P = .004) in the placebo group. In the bone marrow cell-treated patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a 3% absolute increase in LVEF was observed at 3 months (95% CI, 0.5% to 4.7%; n = 18), but the placebo group showed no improvement. CCS angina score improved significantly in the bone marrow cell group (6-month absolute difference, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.48; P < .001) compared with no significant improvement in the placebo group. Quality-of-life score increased from 56% (9%) to 64% (12%) at 3 months and 69% (12%) at 6 months in bone marrow cell-treated patients, compared with a smaller increase in the placebo group from 57% (11%) to 61% (14%) to 64% (17%). The improvements in CCS class and quality of life score were significantly greater in bone marrow cell-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study of patients with chronic myocardial ischemia refractory to medical treatment, intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection resulted in a statistically significant but modest improvement in myocardial perfusion compared with placebo. Further studies are required to assess long-term results and efficacy for mortality and morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR400 and isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN58194927.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.685

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Financial barriers to health care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction

    Rahimi, A. R., Spertus, J. A., Reid, K. J., Bernheim, S. M., & Krumholz, H. M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.10.1063 · Cited by 223 · cited 1×

    “Quality of life was assessed using the disease-specific Seattle Angina Questionnaire ranging from 0% to 100% (higher scores indicating better health status; mean difference 5% considered clinically significant).(13,14) A bicycle exercise test (to evaluate exercise capacity), SPECT (to assess myocardial perfusion), and…”
    Method

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
van Ramshorst, J., Bax, J. J., Beeres, S. L. M. A., Dibbets-Schneider, P., Roes, S. D., Stokkel, M. P. M., de Roos, A., Fibbe, W. E., Zwaginga, J. J., Boersma, E., Schalij, M. J., & Atsma, D. E.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-05-20
Volume
301
Issue
19
Pages
1997
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2009293798
Cited by
300
References
1
FWCI
17.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intramyocardial Bone Marrow Cell Injection for Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.685
The paper
van Ramshorst, J., Bax, J. J., Beeres, S. L. M. A., Dibbets-Schneider, P., Roes, S. D., Stokkel, M. P. M., de Roos, A., Fibbe, W. E., Zwaginga, J. J., Boersma, E., Schalij, M. J., & Atsma, D. E. (2009). Intramyocardial Bone Marrow Cell Injection for Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.685

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.