Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Individual Patient Data

Open access
Gyöngyösi, Mariann, Wojakowski, Wojciech, Lemarchand, Patricia, Lunde, Ketil, Tendera, Michal, Bartunek, Jozef, Marban, Eduardo, Assmus, Birgit, Henry, Timothy D., Traverse, Jay H., Moyé, Lemuel A., Sürder, Daniel, Corti, Roberto, Huikuri, Heikki, Miettinen, Johanna, Wöhrle, Jochen, Obradovic, Slobodan, Roncalli, Jérome, Malliaras, Konstantinos, Pokushalov, Evgeny, Romanov, Alexander, Kastrup, Jens, Bergmann, Martin W., Atsma, Douwe E., Diederichsen, Axel, Edes, Istvan, Benedek, Imre, Benedek, Theodora, Pejkov, Hristo, Nyolczas, Noemi, Pavo, Noemi, Bergler-Klein, Jutta, Pavo, Imre J., Sylven, Christer, Berti, Sergio, Navarese, Eliano P., Maurer, Gerald·2015·Circulation Research

Abstract

Rationale : The meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac study is the first prospectively declared collaborative multinational database, including individual data of patients with ischemic heart disease treated with cell therapy. Objective : We analyzed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252). Methods and Results : The primary end point was freedom from combined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (including all-cause death, AMI recurrance, stroke, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary end point was freedom from hard clinical end points (death, AMI recurrence, or stroke), assessed with random-effects meta-analyses and Cox regressions for interactions. Secondary efficacy end points included changes in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses and ANCOVA. We reported weighted mean differences between cell therapy and control groups. No effect of cell therapy on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (14.0% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63–1.18) or death (1.4% versus 2.1%) or death/AMI recurrence/stroke (2.9% versus 4.7%) was identified in comparison with controls. No changes in ejection fraction (mean difference: 0.96%; 95% confidence interval, −0.2 to 2.1), end-diastolic volume, or systolic volume were observed compared with controls. These results were not influenced by anterior AMI location, reduced baseline ejection fraction, or the use of MRI for assessing left ventricular parameters. Conclusions : This meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials in patients with recent AMI revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided no benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01098591.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.116.304346

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Gyöngyösi, M., Wojakowski, W., Lemarchand, P., Lunde, K., Tendera, M., Bartunek, J., Marban, E., Assmus, B., Henry, T. D., Traverse, J. H., Moyé, L. A., Sürder, D., Corti, R., Huikuri, H., Miettinen, J., Wöhrle, J., Obradovic, S., Roncalli, J., Malliaras, K., Pokushalov, E., Romanov, A., Kastrup, J., Bergmann, M. W., Atsma, D. E., Diederichsen, A., Edes, I., Benedek, I., Benedek, T., Pejkov, H., Nyolczas, N., Pavo, N., Bergler-Klein, J., Pavo, I. J., Sylven, C., Berti, S., Navarese, E. P., & Maurer, G.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
116
Issue
8
Pages
1346-1360
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2058095177
Cited by
313
References
51
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Individual Patient Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circresaha.116.304346
The paper
Gyöngyösi, M., Wojakowski, W., Lemarchand, P., Lunde, K., Tendera, M., Bartunek, J., Marban, E., Assmus, B., Henry, T. D., Traverse, J. H., Moyé, L. A., Sürder, D., Corti, R., Huikuri, H., Miettinen, J., Wöhrle, J., Obradovic, S., Roncalli, J., Malliaras, K., . . . Maurer, G. (2015). Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Individual Patient Data. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.116.304346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.